WIPP Agency-Initiated Modification Draft Permit

679 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Lauralyn Pryor

6/18/26 @ 9:09 AM
I support NMED's permit modifications to the WIPP permit. It is critical for LANL's radioactive waste to go to WIPP before the next wildfire. Please protect our communities.
No attachments

Comment From: Central Plateau Cleanup Contra... (Benjamin (Ben) Conlon)

6/18/26 @ 7:44 AM
Central Plateau Cleanup Company (CPCCo)at the Hanford Site (Benjamin Conlon)
Thank you for the opportunity to review the Agency-Initiated Draft Hazardous Waste Permit for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Attached are our current comments but we do re...
Attachments:

Comment From: James Mittelmark

6/17/26 @ 3:40 PM
I strongly support the WIPP Agency-Initiated Modification Draft Permit as proposed by NMED for the following reasons:

The DOE's storage of legacy nuclear waste in a wild fire zone threatens my health and safety and my home as well as the health, saf...
No attachments

Comment From: Dee Homans

6/17/26 @ 2:09 PM

We support the modification permit proposed by NMED. DOE has not fulfulled its promises. Legacy waste currently stored above ground at LANL needs to be buried at WIPP as originally intended.. 

We are afraid that there will be a push to prioritize the ...

I'm writing in support of the WIPP Agency-Initiated Modification Draft Permit as proposed by NMED for the

following reasons:

• DOE's irresponsible storage of legacy waste threatens the health and safety of people and their property in

several states.

• The proposed permit modifications are needed because DOE is not fulfilling its legal agreements.

Thank you for considering my comments.


No attachments

Comment From: Nancy O'Donohue

6/17/26 @ 1:27 PM Form Letter 13
I support NMED's permit modifications to the WIPP permit.
No attachments

Comment From: CDOD, EDCLC, LEDC, RCCEDC (kristen gamboa)

6/17/26 @ 1:05 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Jean Stevens

6/17/26 @ 12:01 PM

To whom it may concern,



I'm writing in support of the WIPP Agency-Initiated Modification Draft Permit as proposed by NMED for the


following reasons:


DOE's irresponsible storage of legacy waste threatens the health and safety of people and their property...


several states.


The proposed permit modifications are needed because DOE is not fulfilling its legal agreements.



I am also including this letter to the editor, Santa Fe New Mexican, of which I am in complete agreement:



"here are two opposing views whether the New Mexico Environment Department should modify the permit that allows the Department of Energy to operate the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. By modifying the permit, the state NMED forces the federal DOE to do what it always agreed to, move Cold War "legacy" waste to WIPP, where it's safer underground. DOE failed to move this waste because it improperly handled it when it was made. It will, therefore, take extra time, workers, and equipment to get it ready to ship to WIPP.



The two sides seem to be divided by geography, north vs south, and whether the federal or state government should decide what's best for New Mexico.



Northerners worry about their health, property values, and economy. They want the nuclear waste made by the feds in the 1950s at Los Alamos National Labs moved from the forest, where it is currently stored in fabric tents in a wildfire zone. Radioactive waste vaporized in a wildfire is spread on winds, permanently contaminating property and people. Northerners, closer to the waste in the forest, want it shipped to WIPP now. They believe WIPP is needed and expected it to go there decades ago. Moving legacy waste from LANL and other labs remains the original mission of WIPP, one which DOE has failed for LANL. Northerners think the state does a better job of protecting New Mexicans than the feds on this issue.



The southern part of NM is worried it will lose jobs and WIPP. The majority of comments opposing the permit modification are from out-of-state union workers and most say, "based on the historically low number of shipments [of legacy waste from the Cold War] received from LANL," it will be almost impossible to move it to WIPP without people losing jobs. The first part of this argument is exactly why people support the permit modifications: the number of shipments IS historically low. It shouldn't be. If DOE were doing what it agreed to, LANL legacy waste would have high numbers of shipments, now be in WIPP, and no longer a risk. Some who oppose the change have even claimed it is a "political hit job" by the outgoing administration. They accuse northern folks of seeing no use for WIPP, despite their desperate calls to move it out of the forest and into the underground repository. Southerners blame the state and think the feds will better protect them.



In reality, DOE failed New Mexico. It's unfortunate it has to be forced to keep New Mexicans safe from the waste it created here, but that's why the permit must be changed.



The modifications will protect New Mexicans all over the state. A radiation release, likely where the waste is now, would devastate the whole state by:


Killing 50% of the nearby population within 30 days


Causing astronomical rates of cancers further from the release (Downwinders show the feds don't reimburse health costs due to radiation)


Bringing property values down to zero (Downwinders show the feds don't reimburse property loss due to radiation)


Permanent economic ruin for agriculture, ranching, recreation, etc. on land made useless for 500,000 years, destroying the tax base for the state.



Disasters can be avoided and this one must because it will be permanent. Changing the permit moves the LANL legacy waste, not in decades, but now. DOE's progress will be tracked and consequences applied if DOE continues to fail. New Mexico is standing up FOR us and TO the feds."



Please save New Mexicans from this insane catastrophe by not moving the nuke waste ASAP before another 220,000 acres blaze (2022 Mora region fire) overtakes LANL and makes the Land of Enchantment into the Land of Disenchanted Ghosts!



Sincerely,


Jean Stevens, MFA

No attachments

Comment From: Carlsbad Department of Develop... (kristen gamboa)

6/17/26 @ 11:29 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Washington Dept of Ecology, Nu... (Lola Brooks)

6/17/26 @ 10:30 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Robert Grant

6/17/26 @ 10:24 AM Form Letter 14
I strongly support the NMED draft permit that makes it clear to the D.O.E. that it has to move all the Cold War legacy waste that is stored unsafely at LANL into WIPP. These permit modifications simply describe how DOE will accomplish its original m...
No attachments

Comment From: Cindy Kuenzi

6/16/26 @ 7:59 PM
I am writing in support of the WIPP Agency-Initiated Modification Draft Permit as proposed by NMED. DOE is responsible for safely storing legacy waste and they are ignoring their lawful responsibility. The storage of radioactive waste above ground,...
No attachments

Comment From: Diane Kenny

6/16/26 @ 3:57 PM
I have seen the barrels of waste sitting outdoors at LANL for many years. They should have been removed long ago to protect New Mexicans. The danger of wildfire is all too apparent, and ash that is transported by wind would absolutely be inhaled by...
No attachments

Comment From: Carolyn Benson

6/16/26 @ 11:57 AM

dear sirs, madams, please bury those barrels of dangerous nuclear waste pronto. they are not safely disposed of  currently but apparently in tents only. They must be buried accd to exact standards as advised. 

thankyou, MsCarol Benson, albuquerque.


No attachments

Comment From: Ken Hughes

6/16/26 @ 10:30 AM Form Letter 14
I strongly support the NMED draft permit that makes it clear to the DOE that it has to move all the Cold War legacy waste that is stored unsafely at LANL into WIPP. These permit modifications simply describe how DOE will accomplish its original miss...
No attachments

Comment From: S Barela

6/16/26 @ 10:23 AM
Be advised that the nuclear waste at LANL needs to be moved immediately to a proper safe storage site.
No attachments

Comment From: Darrel Owen

6/16/26 @ 10:11 AM
I fully support the modification of NMED's permit because of the eight wildfires that have burned in the area surrounding LANL and the very real possibility of more fires in the future. This area is subject to wildfires and storing this waste in a wi...
No attachments

Comment From: Magdelyn Brennan

6/16/26 @ 7:37 AM Form Letter 13
I support NMCD's permit modification to the WIPP permit.
No attachments

Comment From: Bill Riker

6/15/26 @ 3:36 PM Form Letter 15

I'm concerned about the continued existence of old legacy waste housed unsafely outside LANL. I'm writing in support of the WIPP Agency-Initiated Modification Draft Permit as proposed by NMED as it presses the federal government to rapidly remove tha...


It appears that DOE has deliberately stalled the process of moving this waste to a safe place (i.e., WIPP). This is irresponsible, especially in the face of increasing likelihood of dangerous fires, as it gets hotter and drier. People - not just in New Mexico, but across several Western states - are at risk of radioactive contamination, should a fire consume this waste.


In addition, DOE is not fulfilling its legal agreements, and so it is necessary to escalate pressure on the agency.


Thank you for considering my comments.

Thanks for listening.


Bill Riker

Cochiti Lake


No attachments

Comment From: Fred Helms

6/15/26 @ 3:22 PM Form Letter 14
I strongly support the NMED draft permit that makes it clear to the D.O.E. that it has to move all the Cold War legacy waste that is stored unsafely at LANL into WIPP. These permit modifications simply describe how DOE will accomplish its original m...
No attachments

Comment From: Karen Boehler

6/15/26 @ 1:49 PM Form Letter 14
I strongly support the NMED draft permit that makes it clear to the D.O.E. that it has to move all the Cold War legacy waste that is stored unsafely at LANL into WIPP. These permit modifications simply describe how DOE will accomplish its original m...
No attachments

Comment From: Jean Darling

6/15/26 @ 1:18 PM Form Letter 15
I'm concerned about the continued existence of old legacy waste housed unsafely outside LANL. I'm writing in support of the WIPP Agency-Initiated Modification Draft Permit as proposed by NMED as it presses the federal government to rapidly remove th...
No attachments

Comment From: Kurt Anderson

6/15/26 @ 12:07 PM Form Letter 14
I strongly support the NMED draft permit that makes it clear to the D.O.E. that it has to move all the Cold War legacy waste that is stored unsafely at LANL into WIPP. These permit modifications simply describe how DOE will accomplish its original m...
No attachments

Comment From: Barbara Calef

6/15/26 @ 11:45 AM Form Letter 14
I strongly support the NMED draft permit that makes it clear to the D.O.E. that it has to move all the Cold War legacy waste that is stored unsafely at LANL into WIPP. These permit modifications simply describe how DOE will accomplish its original m...
No attachments

Comment From: Reel Chefs Catering (steve watson)

6/15/26 @ 9:41 AM
These WIPP Permit Modifications need to be put into place immediately!! There is too much carelessness going on with controlled fires in this state! we can not risk another out of control burn fire disaster !!
No attachments

Comment From: Jonnie Head

6/14/26 @ 8:16 PM Form Letter 13
Please support this effort. Just Makes good sense
No attachments

Comment From: david Noble

6/14/26 @ 3:15 PM
Move contaminated waste stored in Los Alamos to WIPP ASAP.
No attachments

Comment From: Lisa Blum

6/14/26 @ 11:42 AM

I'm writing in support of the WIPP Agency-Initiated Modification Draft Permit as proposed by NMED because DOE's irresponsible storage of legacy waste threatens the health and safety of people like me and my neighbors.  It threatens our property value...



DOE has been irresponsible in not dealing with this issue. We are just lucky that the fires in previous years have not gotten to the stored waste which would be catastrophic. 



The proposed permit modifications are needed NOW! 

Thank you for considering my comments.


No attachments

Comment From: Sandra Ingerman

6/14/26 @ 11:39 AM
I don't want NM to suffer more damage from radiation in due to LANL. Too many people over the years have gotten life threatening illnesses. This has to stop. And LANL needs to get rid of the uranium in tents before the next wildfire. This is called i...
No attachments

Comment From: Melissa Smock

6/14/26 @ 11:22 AM Form Letter 13
I support NMED's permit modifications to the WIPP permit.
No attachments

Comment From: Ann Dunlap

6/14/26 @ 11:18 AM
It seems clear that having this LANL nuclear waste in barrels in a tent in a forest vulnerable to wildfires is inviting disaster. I urge the authorities to facilitate the removal of this waste to the WIPP by approving the necessary changes in the per...
No attachments

Comment From: Martha Kemper

6/14/26 @ 10:36 AM
Emplace the Waste. Reduce the Risk. The risk of wildfires in New Mexico is indisputable. Couple with that, the risk of wildfire mixed with radiation should make the emplacement of the radiation waste and the imperative of reducing such waste a 'no-...
No attachments

Comment From: Lorna Duer

6/14/26 @ 9:51 AM
I implore you to move all nuclear waste from LANL to WHIPP ASAP. You had a big fire in the Kate 20th century. We can't afford one with nuclear waste involved.
No attachments

Comment From: anne salzmann

6/14/26 @ 8:53 AM Form Letter 13
I support NMCD's permit modification to the WIPP permit.
No attachments

Comment From: Marcy Haig

6/14/26 @ 8:23 AM Form Letter 13
I support NMED modifications to the WIPP permit!!!!!!
No attachments

Comment From: LORIN SPAULDING

6/14/26 @ 6:41 AM
I strongly support the NMED draft permit prioritizing the move of nuclear waste from the temporary, un-secure site at LANL to the permanent WIPP site. The current aboveground storage of LANL nuclear waste at LANL at a temporary above-ground site, som...
No attachments

Comment From: John Harmon

6/13/26 @ 10:12 PM Form Letter 13
The DOE should be permitted to move the legacy nuclear wastep at Los Alamos to the WIPP facility I support NMED's permit modifications to the WIPP permit.
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Gerber

6/13/26 @ 8:27 PM Form Letter 13
I support NMED AIM
No attachments

Comment From: Marline Scally

6/13/26 @ 8:27 PM Form Letter 13
I support NMED's permit modifications to the WIPP permit.
No attachments

Comment From: David Barnett

6/13/26 @ 7:44 PM
I am writing to express my support for the NMED Agency Initiated Modification (AIM) which seeks changes to the WIPP Permit that clarifies the priority to emplace legacy waste and reduce the risk of LANL legacy waste.

Cold War nuclear waste from the...
No attachments

Comment From: Charlotte Rivera

6/13/26 @ 6:14 PM
Cold War nuclear waste from the 1950s-on is stored at LANL in fabric tents on a mesa in a wildfire zone. This waste should go to the appropriate waste dump in New Mexico, called WIPP, before the next wildfire. Eight fires have burned around LANL in t...
No attachments

Comment From: Naima Shea

6/13/26 @ 4:55 PM
I wish to submit a comment supporting NMED's permit modification to the WIPP permit.
It is long overdue to move the nuclear waste material presently being stored in an unsafe manner to an appropriate waste dump, preferably out of a fire prone, droug...
No attachments

Comment From: Barry Goldberg

6/13/26 @ 4:40 PM
Please support NMED permit modifications to the WIPP permit. As elders, we are concerned about safety, health, the environment and our property values. The current administration has shown itself to constantly lie and is no longer trustworthy to be ...
No attachments

Comment From: Patricia Arens

6/13/26 @ 4:14 PM Form Letter 3
As a long-term resident of Santa Fe, NM, I vigorously support NMED's permit modifications to proposed WIPP permit--& ASAP--before the next wild fire erupts with the potential to cause devastating consequences.
No attachments

Comment From: Roger Peirce

6/13/26 @ 3:42 PM Form Letter 13
I support NMED's permit modifications to the WIPP permit.
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Peirce

6/13/26 @ 3:41 PM Form Letter 13
I support NMED's permit modifications to the WIPP permit.
No attachments

Comment From: Suzanne Coffey

6/13/26 @ 1:37 PM
I am writing in support of the WIPP Agency-Initiated Modificaion Draft Permit because of the danger to all life and land in this extensive area we so love due to profound neglect of the DOE in failing to follow safety requirements. The proposed permi...
No attachments

Comment From: Barb OConnor

6/13/26 @ 1:34 PM
I want to see that the DOE clean up All the Legacy Waste at LANL before taking on any other projects! The people in Los Alamos and in all the surrounding areas are at Risk and this Waste is finding its way into the Rio Grande
River also and affects m...
No attachments

Comment From: Michele Chavez

6/13/26 @ 12:32 PM
This comment regards the recent WIPP Permit Modification that seeks changes to the WIPP Permit that clarifies the priority to emplace legacy waste and reduce the risk of LANL legacy waste.

I urge you to use every opportunity available to your agenc...
No attachments

Comment From: Debra Snyderman

6/13/26 @ 9:14 AM Form Letter 13
I support the decisions made by NMED regarding the AIM Draft Permit.
No attachments

Comment From: Seth King

6/11/26 @ 5:21 PM
Submitted via: HWB-WIPP-Comment@env.nm.gov
Re: Public Comment on Agency-Initiated Draft Hazardous Waste Facility Permit for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
Public Notice No. 26-05 | EPA ID No. NM4890139088-TSDF

To the New Mexico Environment Departme...
No attachments

Comment From: Craig STEPHENS

6/11/26 @ 4:13 PM
My name is Craig Stephens and I am a lifelong resident of Carlsbad and New Mexico. I was in business in Carlsbad for 47 years. We raised our two children in Carlsbad, one of which is a 4th grade teacher in Carlsbad and the other a retired USAF Lt. Co...
No attachments

Comment From: Kim Crickard

6/11/26 @ 12:00 PM

My name is Kim Crickard. I worked as an electrician at a nucleear power plant in California years ago. It was very poorly run, and the threat of nuclear waste in populated areas concerns me greatly. You obviously are running your project just as badl...

No attachments

Comment From: Jana Gunnell

6/09/26 @ 1:23 PM Form Letter 13
Dear NMED staff,
I SUPPORT NMED's modification of the WIPP permit.
thank you so much,
Jana Gunnell, MD, MPH
NM Department of Health (retired)
No attachments

Comment From: Debra Efroymson

6/08/26 @ 11:22 PM Form Letter 12
Attachments:

Comment From: Donna Bell

6/08/26 @ 11:11 PM Form Letter 12
Attachments:

Comment From: Mai Ting

6/08/26 @ 11:02 PM Form Letter 12
Attachments:

Comment From: Daniel Clearinger y Martinez

6/08/26 @ 10:31 PM Form Letter 12
Attachments:

Comment From: Winston DeLaurier

6/08/26 @ 10:15 PM Form Letter 12
Attachments:

Comment From: Daniel F. DeMaggio

6/08/26 @ 9:55 PM Form Letter 12
Attachments:

Comment From: GARY LASSWELL

6/08/26 @ 4:34 PM
To: New Mexico Environment Department

Regarding: WIPP Agency-Initiated Modification Draft Permit

I am writing to support the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) draft Hazardous Waste Facility Permit modification to the Waste Isolation Pilot Pl...
No attachments

Comment From: Janice Baker

6/08/26 @ 3:50 PM
I strongly support the New Mexico Environmental Department's (NMED's) modifications of the WIPP permit because the Dept. of Energy (DOE) has failed to perform its obligations under the original WIPP permit. The modifications would set deadlines for D...
No attachments

Comment From: Cathrynn N. Brown

6/08/26 @ 2:47 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Ruby Sullivan

6/08/26 @ 2:38 PM
To the NMED,
My name is Ruby Sullivan and as a member of the public, I'm writing to inform you of my support for the WIPP permit modification. I would also like to thank NMED for listening to the public, taking the DOE's failure to meet its obligatio...
No attachments

Comment From: Barbara Gaerlen

6/08/26 @ 2:00 PM Form Letter 12

USPS Form Letter

Attachments:

Comment From: Michael Fehr

6/08/26 @ 2:00 PM Form Letter 12

USPS Form Letter

Attachments:

Comment From: Lorelei Taylor

6/08/26 @ 2:00 PM Form Letter 12

USPS Form Letter

Attachments:

Comment From: Jean Stevens

6/08/26 @ 12:00 PM

Please remove all legacy waste from the Los Alamos National Laboratory ASAP to WIPP! There is currently a film which premiered at the Telluride Mountain Film Festival in May, "Burn Scar" about the 250,000 acres that burned near Mora in 2022. What wou...


I live in Taos, 45 miles downwind from LANL. Many people evacuated in 2011 when the Los Conchas fire came within three miles of Area G. This was broadcast nationally that about 60,000 barrels were sitting under tents. LANL has been extremely irresponsible to the all the human souls residing in Northern NM! Many folks, whom could, evacuated Taos in 2011. Plutonium cannot be detected by Geiger Counters which were placed at Holy Cross Hospital


The residents of Northern New Mexico dodged a "radioactive bullet" in 2012 but our luck cannot last with the historic droughts we are living with in 2026 and beyond!

No attachments

Comment From: Ava Curtis

6/08/26 @ 12:00 PM

NMED's move to move LANL waste to WIPP is essential to keep communities downstream, like where I live in Albuquerque safe. This will prevent accidents and reduce the risk wildfire poses to the waste.

No attachments

Comment From: Chad Chandler

6/08/26 @ 11:46 AM
I would like to submit a comment IN FAVOR of the New Mexico Environment Department's proposed changes to the WIPP operating permit.

WIPP (Waste Isolation Pilot Plant) started operations in 1999 for the purpose of being a repository for nuclear waste...
No attachments

Comment From: New Mexico IDEA (Jason Espinoza)

6/08/26 @ 11:20 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Alaina Szostkowski

6/08/26 @ 10:38 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Lisa Verdi

6/08/26 @ 10:28 AM

how is it possible nuclear waste is sitting around los alamos? shouldn't there be giant signs warning us about this? but now there is a chance it can be moved to WIPP? isn't that what WIPP is for? please! allow whatever rules needed to move this wast...

respectfully,

Lisa Verdi 


No attachments

Comment From: New York State Energy Research... (Eleanor Eshenour)

6/08/26 @ 8:37 AM

The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) submits the attached written comments in strong support of the New Mexico Environment Department’s (NMED) proposed Agency-Initiated Modifications (AIM) to the Waste Isolation Pilo...


Thank you for your consideration.


Eleanor Eshenour

Office Manager


Attachments:

Comment From: Elizabeth Foree

6/07/26 @ 12:45 PM

To NMED,


I am writing in support of the WIPP Agency-Initiated Modification Draft Permit as proposed by NMED because it will allow NMED to measure and track DOE's progress in identifying the legacy waste at LANL, and transport the waste to WIPP along t...


Thank you for considering my comments.

Elizabeth Foree

140 Principe de Paz

Santa Fe, NM 87508


No attachments

Comment From: Beth Cohen

6/06/26 @ 3:06 PM
As a proud and concerned resident of the State of New Mexico since 1983, I am fearful about the legacy waste being stored in tents near a place in Los Alamos where three major wildfires have recently occurred. Wildfire can occur at any time in New Me...
No attachments

Comment From: Joan Quinn

6/06/26 @ 2:43 PM
Please protect New Mexico's land and water. I support NMED's permit modifications to prioritize cleanup of LANL legacy waste and ensure timely disposal at WIPP. Thank you.
Joan Quinn
Albuquerque
No attachments

Comment From: DOE Office of Environmental Ma... (Joanna Hardin)

6/05/26 @ 6:20 PM

Thank you for the opportunity to review the Agency-Initiated Draft Hazardous Waste Permit for Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.  Attached is a request for extension to the public comment period.  Additionally, the Department of Energy Oak Ridge Office of ...


Your consideration and approval of both requests is appreciated.


Attachments:

Comment From: Karen Cohen

6/05/26 @ 4:47 PM
I support the NMED AIM to the WIPP permit which clarifies the obligation to prioritize the emplacement of LANL legacy waste at WIPP over waste from other sources. Nuclear waste stored at LANL is in a precarious position, vulnerable to wildfire and o...
No attachments

Comment From: Frank Mendlik

6/05/26 @ 2:10 PM Form Letter 1

New Mexico Environment Department ,

I am writing to oppose New Mexico Environment Department's proposed permit that would establish mandatory shipment limits from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) before shipments from other cleanup sites can cont...

WIPP is a critical part of our nation’s infrastructure. It plays an essential role in safely managing nuclear waste from cleanup sites across the United States while supporting thousands of good-paying union jobs, local businesses, and communities that depend on stable operations at nuclear facilities and cleanup sites. 

The proposed shipment limits would create serious risks and disruptions far beyond New Mexico. Based on the historically low number of shipments received from LANL, the mandatory thresholds outlined in this proposal would be nearly impossible to meet. As a result, shipments from other cleanup sites could effectively be halted, which would slow or cease operations at WIPP itself.

Working people should not bear the consequences of decisions that weaken safety, threaten jobs, and destabilize critical systems that communities across the country rely upon. WIPP’s ability to safely and consistently receive waste from cleanup sites nationwide is essential to maintaining responsible operations and protecting workers, communities, and the environment.

Sincerely,

Frank Mendlik 

fsamlegm3@windstream.net 

141 Woodview Dr. 

Elyria , Ohio 44035



No attachments

Comment From: Kay Matthews

6/05/26 @ 1:45 PM
Dear NMED,

I support the New Mexico Environment Department sanctioning the Department of Energy if the agency does not make cleaning up Los Alamos Labs a priority, including stopping shipments to WIPP from other states.
No attachments

Comment From: Mark Wojtowicz

6/05/26 @ 8:06 AM Form Letter 1

New Mexico Environment Department ,

I am writing to oppose New Mexico Environment Department's proposed permit that would establish mandatory shipment limits from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) before shipments from other cleanup sites can cont...

WIPP is a critical part of our nation’s infrastructure. It plays an essential role in safely managing nuclear waste from cleanup sites across the United States while supporting thousands of good-paying union jobs, local businesses, and communities that depend on stable operations at nuclear facilities and cleanup sites. 

The proposed shipment limits would create serious risks and disruptions far beyond New Mexico. Based on the historically low number of shipments received from LANL, the mandatory thresholds outlined in this proposal would be nearly impossible to meet. As a result, shipments from other cleanup sites could effectively be halted, which would slow or cease operations at WIPP itself.

Working people should not bear the consequences of decisions that weaken safety, threaten jobs, and destabilize critical systems that communities across the country rely upon. WIPP’s ability to safely and consistently receive waste from cleanup sites nationwide is essential to maintaining responsible operations and protecting workers, communities, and the environment.

Sincerely,

Mark Wojtowicz 

markwojo@aol.com 

26357 Sprague Rd 

Columbia Station, Ohio 44028


No attachments

Comment From: Edward Berge

6/04/26 @ 3:52 PM
DOE claims it will take decades to move the legacy wast out of the forest around LANL to WIPP. NMED claims it can be done in less than two years. NMED's modification to the permit is necessary and I support it.
No attachments

Comment From: Bud Ryan

6/04/26 @ 1:57 PM
I want to see that the DOE clean up All the Legacy Waste at LANL before taking on any other projects! The people in Los Alamos are at Risk & this Waste finds its way into the Rio Grande River also & affects many living things along the way.
No attachments

Comment From: Clay Gray

6/04/26 @ 11:31 AM Form Letter 1

New Mexico Environment Department ,

I am writing to oppose New Mexico Environment Department's proposed permit that would establish mandatory shipment limits from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) before shipments from other cleanup sites can cont...

WIPP is a critical part of our nation’s infrastructure. It plays an essential role in safely managing nuclear waste from cleanup sites across the United States while supporting thousands of good-paying union jobs, local businesses, and communities that depend on stable operations at nuclear facilities and cleanup sites. 

The proposed shipment limits would create serious risks and disruptions far beyond New Mexico. Based on the historically low number of shipments received from LANL, the mandatory thresholds outlined in this proposal would be nearly impossible to meet. As a result, shipments from other cleanup sites could effectively be halted, which would slow or cease operations at WIPP itself.

Working people should not bear the consequences of decisions that weaken safety, threaten jobs, and destabilize critical systems that communities across the country rely upon. WIPP’s ability to safely and consistently receive waste from cleanup sites nationwide is essential to maintaining responsible operations and protecting workers, communities, and the environment.

Sincerely,

Clay Gray 

clay.gray2@aol.com 

6524 welsh rd 

Nashport, Ohio 43830



No attachments

Comment From: Troy Hartshorn

6/04/26 @ 11:31 AM Form Letter 1

New Mexico Environment Department ,

I am writing to oppose New Mexico Environment Department's proposed permit that would establish mandatory shipment limits from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) before shipments from other cleanup sites can cont...

WIPP is a critical part of our nation’s infrastructure. It plays an essential role in safely managing nuclear waste from cleanup sites across the United States while supporting thousands of good-paying union jobs, local businesses, and communities that depend on stable operations at nuclear facilities and cleanup sites. 

The proposed shipment limits would create serious risks and disruptions far beyond New Mexico. Based on the historically low number of shipments received from LANL, the mandatory thresholds outlined in this proposal would be nearly impossible to meet. As a result, shipments from other cleanup sites could effectively be halted, which would slow or cease operations at WIPP itself.

Working people should not bear the consequences of decisions that weaken safety, threaten jobs, and destabilize critical systems that communities across the country rely upon. WIPP’s ability to safely and consistently receive waste from cleanup sites nationwide is essential to maintaining responsible operations and protecting workers, communities, and the environment.

Sincerely,

Troy Hartshorn 

trh67@icloud.com 

Claypool Rd SE, 18180 

Newark , Ohio 43056



No attachments

Comment From: Douglas Mcpeck

6/04/26 @ 11:30 AM Form Letter 1

New Mexico Environment Department ,

I am writing to oppose New Mexico Environment Department's proposed permit that would establish mandatory shipment limits from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) before shipments from other cleanup sites can cont...

WIPP is a critical part of our nation’s infrastructure. It plays an essential role in safely managing nuclear waste from cleanup sites across the United States while supporting thousands of good-paying union jobs, local businesses, and communities that depend on stable operations at nuclear facilities and cleanup sites. 

The proposed shipment limits would create serious risks and disruptions far beyond New Mexico. Based on the historically low number of shipments received from LANL, the mandatory thresholds outlined in this proposal would be nearly impossible to meet. As a result, shipments from other cleanup sites could effectively be halted, which would slow or cease operations at WIPP itself.

Working people should not bear the consequences of decisions that weaken safety, threaten jobs, and destabilize critical systems that communities across the country rely upon. WIPP’s ability to safely and consistently receive waste from cleanup sites nationwide is essential to maintaining responsible operations and protecting workers, communities, and the environment.

Sincerely,

Douglas Mcpeck 

mcpeckdouglas@yahoo.com 

2757 lawhead ln 

Zanesville , Ohio 43701


No attachments

Comment From: Tyler Dickerson

6/04/26 @ 11:30 AM Form Letter 1

New Mexico Environment Department ,

I am writing to oppose New Mexico Environment Department's proposed permit that would establish mandatory shipment limits from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) before shipments from other cleanup sites can cont...

WIPP is a critical part of our nation’s infrastructure. It plays an essential role in safely managing nuclear waste from cleanup sites across the United States while supporting thousands of good-paying union jobs, local businesses, and communities that depend on stable operations at nuclear facilities and cleanup sites. 

The proposed shipment limits would create serious risks and disruptions far beyond New Mexico. Based on the historically low number of shipments received from LANL, the mandatory thresholds outlined in this proposal would be nearly impossible to meet. As a result, shipments from other cleanup sites could effectively be halted, which would slow or cease operations at WIPP itself.

Working people should not bear the consequences of decisions that weaken safety, threaten jobs, and destabilize critical systems that communities across the country rely upon. WIPP’s ability to safely and consistently receive waste from cleanup sites nationwide is essential to maintaining responsible operations and protecting workers, communities, and the environment.

Sincerely,

Tyler Dickerson 

95dickersont@gmail.com 

50481 township road 200 

Fresno, Ohio 43824



No attachments

Comment From: Jim Rodgers

6/04/26 @ 11:08 AM
Working at a DOE Environmental Cleanup Site in Paducah Ky the work at WIPP is important in keeping on schedule the mission of the DOE for cleanup. Cleanup schedules interrupted are costly to the DOE as well as the taxpayer. Modifications of the perm...
No attachments

Comment From: Mark Marinucci

6/04/26 @ 9:15 AM Form Letter 1

New Mexico Environment Department ,

I am writing to oppose New Mexico Environment Department's proposed permit that would establish mandatory shipment limits from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) before shipments from other cleanup sites can cont...

WIPP is a critical part of our nation’s infrastructure. It plays an essential role in safely managing nuclear waste from cleanup sites across the United States while supporting thousands of good-paying union jobs, local businesses, and communities that depend on stable operations at nuclear facilities and cleanup sites. 

The proposed shipment limits would create serious risks and disruptions far beyond New Mexico. Based on the historically low number of shipments received from LANL, the mandatory thresholds outlined in this proposal would be nearly impossible to meet. As a result, shipments from other cleanup sites could effectively be halted, which would slow or cease operations at WIPP itself.

Working people should not bear the consequences of decisions that weaken safety, threaten jobs, and destabilize critical systems that communities across the country rely upon. WIPP’s ability to safely and consistently receive waste from cleanup sites nationwide is essential to maintaining responsible operations and protecting workers, communities, and the environment.

Sincerely,

Mark Marinucci 

mmal_123@roadrunner.com 

320 N CARPENTER RD 

BRUNSWICK, Ohio 44212



No attachments

Comment From: Michael Ripple

6/04/26 @ 8:48 AM Form Letter 1

New Mexico Environment Department ,

I am writing to oppose New Mexico Environment Department's proposed permit that would establish mandatory shipment limits from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) before shipments from other cleanup sites can cont...

WIPP is a critical part of our nation’s infrastructure. It plays an essential role in safely managing nuclear waste from cleanup sites across the United States while supporting thousands of good-paying union jobs, local businesses, and communities that depend on stable operations at nuclear facilities and cleanup sites. 

The proposed shipment limits would create serious risks and disruptions far beyond New Mexico. Based on the historically low number of shipments received from LANL, the mandatory thresholds outlined in this proposal would be nearly impossible to meet. As a result, shipments from other cleanup sites could effectively be halted, which would slow or cease operations at WIPP itself.

Working people should not bear the consequences of decisions that weaken safety, threaten jobs, and destabilize critical systems that communities across the country rely upon. WIPP’s ability to safely and consistently receive waste from cleanup sites nationwide is essential to maintaining responsible operations and protecting workers, communities, and the environment.

Sincerely,

Michael Ripple 

mripple89@gmail.com 

21 Skyview 

Brunswick, Ohio 44212



No attachments

Comment From: Energy Communities Alliance (Emma Craig )

6/04/26 @ 7:11 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Allyn harad

6/03/26 @ 8:09 PM
Please clean up this potential disaster that directly will effect New Mexico and neighboring states, if not more. Get WHIP to do their responsibility and clean up this mess before a disastrous fire. CLEAN IT UP ALREADY!!
No attachments

Comment From: Mitchell Chapman

6/03/26 @ 2:07 PM
I support NMED's permit modification. My understanding is that LANL is currently storing legacy waste in barrels, in tents, in a general area that has suffered multiple wildfires since the year 2000. This waste needs to be moved to WIPP for safer s...
No attachments

Comment From: Christine Dempsey

6/02/26 @ 5:23 PM Form Letter 1

New Mexico Environment Department ,

I am writing to oppose New Mexico Environment Department's proposed permit that would establish mandatory shipment limits from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) before shipments from other cleanup sites can cont...

WIPP is a critical part of our nation’s infrastructure. It plays an essential role in safely managing nuclear waste from cleanup sites across the United States while supporting thousands of good-paying union jobs, local businesses, and communities that depend on stable operations at nuclear facilities and cleanup sites. 

The proposed shipment limits would create serious risks and disruptions far beyond New Mexico. Based on the historically low number of shipments received from LANL, the mandatory thresholds outlined in this proposal would be nearly impossible to meet. As a result, shipments from other cleanup sites could effectively be halted, which would slow or cease operations at WIPP itself.

Working people should not bear the consequences of decisions that weaken safety, threaten jobs, and destabilize critical systems that communities across the country rely upon. WIPP’s ability to safely and consistently receive waste from cleanup sites nationwide is essential to maintaining responsible operations and protecting workers, communities, and the environment.

Sincerely,

Christine Dempsey 

stine3878@gmail.com 

338 Quail Roost Dr 

Medina, Ohio 44256-1560



No attachments

Comment From: Angela Ramirez

6/02/26 @ 5:20 PM
Regarding the NMED AIM Draft Permit, I urge you to modify the hazardous waste permit to require Los Alamos National Lab to immediately begin removing its nuclear waste accumulated since 1943 and to complete the clean-up within ten years. The contami...
No attachments

Comment From: Anita Marshall-Solinski

6/02/26 @ 5:19 PM Form Letter 1

New Mexico Environment Department ,

I am writing to oppose New Mexico Environment Department's proposed permit that would establish mandatory shipment limits from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) before shipments from other cleanup sites can cont...

WIPP is a critical part of our nation’s infrastructure. It plays an essential role in safely managing nuclear waste from cleanup sites across the United States while supporting thousands of good-paying union jobs, local businesses, and communities that depend on stable operations at nuclear facilities and cleanup sites. 

The proposed shipment limits would create serious risks and disruptions far beyond New Mexico. Based on the historically low number of shipments received from LANL, the mandatory thresholds outlined in this proposal would be nearly impossible to meet. As a result, shipments from other cleanup sites could effectively be halted, which would slow or cease operations at WIPP itself.

Working people should not bear the consequences of decisions that weaken safety, threaten jobs, and destabilize critical systems that communities across the country rely upon. WIPP’s ability to safely and consistently receive waste from cleanup sites nationwide is essential to maintaining responsible operations and protecting workers, communities, and the environment.

Sincerely,

Anita Marshall-Solinski 

barowner9503@yahoo.com 

10025 Deerfield Ct 

Twinsburg, Ohio 44087-3301



No attachments

Comment From: Sofie Hecht

6/02/26 @ 2:41 PM
I strongly support the NMED draft permit that makes it clear to the D.O.E. that it has to move all the legacy waste that is stored unsafely at LANL into WIPP. These modifications simply describe how DOE will accomplish its original mission, which sh...
No attachments

Comment From: Juan Martinez

6/02/26 @ 1:54 PM Form Letter 1

New Mexico Environment Department ,

I am writing to oppose New Mexico Environment Department's proposed permit that would establish mandatory shipment limits from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) before shipments from other cleanup sites can cont...

WIPP is a critical part of our nation’s infrastructure. It plays an essential role in safely managing nuclear waste from cleanup sites across the United States while supporting thousands of good-paying union jobs, local businesses, and communities that depend on stable operations at nuclear facilities and cleanup sites. 

The proposed shipment limits would create serious risks and disruptions far beyond New Mexico. Based on the historically low number of shipments received from LANL, the mandatory thresholds outlined in this proposal would be nearly impossible to meet. As a result, shipments from other cleanup sites could effectively be halted, which would slow or cease operations at WIPP itself.

Working people should not bear the consequences of decisions that weaken safety, threaten jobs, and destabilize critical systems that communities across the country rely upon. WIPP’s ability to safely and consistently receive waste from cleanup sites nationwide is essential to maintaining responsible operations and protecting workers, communities, and the environment.

Sincerely,

Juan Martinez 

juanantoniomartinez86@outlook.com 

3526 fir street 

East chicago, Indiana 46312



No attachments

Comment From: Brandi Barry

6/02/26 @ 12:19 PM Form Letter 1

New Mexico Environment Department ,

I am writing to oppose New Mexico Environment Department's proposed permit that would establish mandatory shipment limits from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) before shipments from other cleanup sites can cont...

WIPP is a critical part of our nation’s infrastructure. It plays an essential role in safely managing nuclear waste from cleanup sites across the United States while supporting thousands of good-paying union jobs, local businesses, and communities that depend on stable operations at nuclear facilities and cleanup sites. 

The proposed shipment limits would create serious risks and disruptions far beyond New Mexico. Based on the historically low number of shipments received from LANL, the mandatory thresholds outlined in this proposal would be nearly impossible to meet. As a result, shipments from other cleanup sites could effectively be halted, which would slow or cease operations at WIPP itself.

Working people should not bear the consequences of decisions that weaken safety, threaten jobs, and destabilize critical systems that communities across the country rely upon. WIPP’s ability to safely and consistently receive waste from cleanup sites nationwide is essential to maintaining responsible operations and protecting workers, communities, and the environment.

Sincerely,

Brandi Barry 

brandi_88@yahoo.com 

84 county road 55 

Ironton, Ohio 45638



No attachments

Comment From: Lura Brookins

6/02/26 @ 12:00 PM

Please alert all persons who can facilitate the safe removal of all nuclear waste! It is especially imperative that this volatile waste be removed from our forests!

No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]