Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC-YGI Microgrid Air Quality Construction Permit Application

Comment From: Iris Deering

7/04/26 @ 11:15 AM

and undisclosed chemicals into our public landfills, and we will just have to wait until somebody notices? Our county has and continues to face an illegal dumping epidemic so how can I be sure that these systemic oversight failures we have locally wo...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Lote Pavloviča

7/04/26 @ 11:15 AM

Im voting against this project cause there is no planet B and this project will kill our planet and the life on it and make it unliveable i mean its already proved that it wont be no good to our nature so how are we even allowing this project. Please...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Alfred Wolfe

7/04/26 @ 11:15 AM

Nobody in the area wants it. Respect the people and the land.

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application shoul...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 11:15 AM

What use is extra AI to our world?

No attachments

Comment From: Leila Ortiz

7/04/26 @ 11:14 AM

I am a resident of La Habra California and I'm using my voice for those of New Mexico, don't do this. There's already a limited water source in New Mexico and it'll become worse with it going towards that data center and not only that it'll affect th...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Hannah Weitzman

7/04/26 @ 11:14 AM

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. ...↓How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution? A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC. A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit.

This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance. We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence. Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. Approving this permit would be government-sponsored environmental racism directed at residents of Doña Ana County.
If the permit is not denied outright, a public hearing needs to be held in Santa Teresa, in both English and Spanish, with an option to participate virtually.

No attachments

Comment From: Katie Tindall

7/04/26 @ 11:14 AM

the building of this data site is an absolute disgrace and no one in the area desires it! we are putting a community with a limited water supply at risk for the sake of a data centre that no body wants. not to mention the amount of irreversible damag...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Aziatul Johan

7/04/26 @ 11:13 AM

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. ...↓How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution? A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC. A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance. We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence. Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilment of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: anonymous anonymous

7/04/26 @ 11:12 AM

We cannot afford more intense heat. The other toxic air pollutants are extremely dangerous–many of them at very low levels. How am I supposed to send my kids to school knowing what they are breathing in? Knowing it can cause permanent brain damage or...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Ariel Apaw

7/04/26 @ 11:12 AM

Stop Project Jupiter
The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's h...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Xic Miles

7/04/26 @ 11:12 AM

People deserve water, our planet deserves to live and not suffer because of data centers.

No attachments

Comment From: Milka Leinonen

7/04/26 @ 11:12 AM

Our planet is literally already in shambles. This is not needed. We've been absolutely fine before, why do this now? We are experiencing immense heatwaves and natural disasters caused by climate change, which WE ourselves have caused. We do realise h...↓

No attachments

Comment From: anonymous anonymous

7/04/26 @ 11:11 AM

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. ...↓How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution? A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC. A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance. We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence. Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilment of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 11:11 AM

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. ...↓How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution? A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC. A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance. We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence. Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilment of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 11:10 AM

I live in Southern Doña Ana County and under no circumstances do I want experimental technology deployed at an unprecedented scale in my backyard. Yucca Growth Infrastructure's gas-powered fuel cell plant is 1,000 times larger than Bloom Energy's big...↓gest existing fuel cell plant. In fact, worldwide, Bloom Energy has developed 1.4 GW of fuel cell technology across more than a thousand locations, yet Yucca Growth Infrastructure is asking for nearly double that (2.46 GW of fuel cells) at a singular location. The largest fuel cell plant in the entire world is more than 30 times smaller than the fuel cell plant under consideration in Santa Teresa. There is absolutely no way to know, with certainty, what the actual pollution levels will be given the tremendous size differential, and thus gap in data, between operational fuel cell plants and this theoretical plant proposed by Yucca Growth Infrastructure. Betting the livability of our county on this unpredictable and unproven plan would be a total capitulation and betrayal of your so-called values: "protects the public health of New Mexicans...by preventing the deterioration of air quality;" "protect and restore the environment...foster a healthy NM for present and future generations" Though approximations of annual air pollution were provided, the testing used an extremely weak methodology leaving us, ultimately, with pseudoscientific guesses that have large margins of error. Estimated pollution levels for this gas-powered fuel cell plant are based on only three 4-hour pollution tests from a very small unit (only 65 kW). This is a far cry from thousands of sweltering fuel cells operating 24/7 at maximum output in close proximity, all in the scorching heat of our open desert. The lack of rigorous testing at even this small of a scale is lazy and very concerning, especially given that the gas power plant Yucca Growth Infrastructure wants to build is 37,000 times bigger than this unit

A 15% "safety margin" was added to the numbers provided by the applicant. Safety margins are not usually added if a company is confident in the accuracy of their pollution estimates. Even small variations from this superficial test will result in massively different levels of pollution and given that the plant will be 37,000 bigger than the testing unit, a 15% safety margin is completely insufficient–it could work as a margin for a single unit, but not the entire plant. If a unit has a 0.01% chance of failing (sounds promising right?), the odds of 37,000 of those units working perfectly at the same time is 2.47% (pathetically low feasibility). That means there is a 97.53% chance that the plant will experience at least one failure. What will the exact level of redundancy be? Will more fuel cells be rubberstamped or pollution levels overlooked in five years or less due to age-related inefficiencies? What about cases of catastrophic failure? Are we approving those deadly incidents of pollution in advance without any real data informing us of the risks at this scale? Highly flammable hydrogen under high pressure only needs a microscopic crack to leak out, ignite, explode, and level entire neighborhoods and schools while sending shockwaves into nearby counties. Assuming this risk, an act of gross negligence, at a scale that has never even remotely been demonstrated in practice would be unbelievably careless. These permits must be denied outright. If further deliberation is desired, a public hearing in Santa Teresa is non-negotiable.

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. Approving this permit would be government-sponsored environmental racism directed at residents of Doña Ana County.
If the permit is not denied outright, a public hearing needs to be held in Santa Teresa, in both English and Spanish, with an option to participate virtually.

No attachments

Comment From: Robert Rodriguez

7/04/26 @ 11:09 AM

Water is already bad as it is! Having a data center in NM or anywhere in the U.S. is criminal!!

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Raya Cabriga

7/04/26 @ 11:08 AM

Stop this! This is causing more damange than good from the use of AI! We do not need this! We can live without this!
The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Thijin Thijin

7/04/26 @ 11:07 AM

Data centers DO NOT need to ruin the environment that's already collapsing and take more power than New York City to power when that could be used for helping the environment or the people who need power not Ai we can live without it !

The public sh...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Mia diaz

7/04/26 @ 11:06 AM

We are already close enough to not be able to stop climate change doing this only solidifies that there will be no more hope for clean water or air for us and the other animals and plants on this earth.

We only have one planet and we are killing our...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Aina fifaliana

7/04/26 @ 11:05 AM

Save the planet ❤️ we will be fine without ai.

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outr...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Sarah Campos

7/04/26 @ 11:04 AM

Dear NMED staff, My name is Sarah Campos. I live in Brazil, Belo Horizonte, MG, and I am writing because I am concerned about the risks and harms Project Jupiter poses to New Mexicans. I am submitting this comment to urge the New Mexico Environment D...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Citlaly Canales

7/04/26 @ 11:03 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 11:01 AM

I am a resident of New Mexico and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here as a 15th generation New Mexican and this is my home. I am only 18 years old, so it's my future on the line. I want to continue ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Rosalinda Roman

7/04/26 @ 10:38 AM

Don't build project Jupiter , our state is already suffering with nothing but desert and have limited resources of water . Our land , and any resources we do have is going to be ruined , and any damage that is done can't be reversed or be saved. We n...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Douglas Kurtz

7/04/26 @ 10:37 AM

Down here in southern New Mexico, we are angry. It seems powers in the northern part of the state want to force a data center on Dona Ana County without regard to the environmental destruction this building will cause. There are concerns that elected...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Victoria Archuleta

7/04/26 @ 10:31 AM

I am writing to express my support for Project Jupiter, which I believe offers significant benefits for our community.

Project Jupiter is poised to bring substantial economic growth to Dona Ana County. It is anticipated to create 4,000 construction...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Margaret McGuinn

7/04/26 @ 10:31 AM

This entire project should be rejected. From step 1, the process has been, at minimum, skewed, and every single commissioner who did not do their due diligence on this proposal should be replaced. The simple fact that NDAs were required by anyone in ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Hilda Ozante

7/04/26 @ 10:31 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Nathan Melton

7/04/26 @ 10:31 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Kurt Grieger

7/04/26 @ 10:28 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Ignacio Regalado

7/04/26 @ 10:27 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Margaret Medina

7/04/26 @ 10:26 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Haley Sanchez

7/04/26 @ 10:21 AM

STOP PROJECT JUPITER. Us, New Mexicans, DO NOT WANT OR NEED what is to come. There are better ways to change and help our community, state and lives. We are crying out to stop making our communities worse. Hardships are only to come with how things a...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Jualie Peters

7/04/26 @ 10:20 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Nigel Raynor

7/04/26 @ 10:19 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Samantha Caballero

7/04/26 @ 10:10 AM

I am strongly opposed to pushing through this infrastructure. It will pollute our homes and deplete our water, which in the desert we already are struggling. There is no place for this here. We do not want to raise the temperature, cause draught, air...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Darek Carnes

7/04/26 @ 10:02 AM

I am writing to express my support for Project Jupiter, which I believe offers significant benefits for our communit
I urge the New Mexico Environment Department to approve this important project.

Sincerely,
Darek Carnes

No attachments

Comment From: Chelsea Ratliff

7/04/26 @ 10:01 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Sydney Chavez

7/04/26 @ 10:01 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Isaiah Gonzalez

7/04/26 @ 10:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Vee Vaughn

7/04/26 @ 10:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Harlow Hale jones hunt

7/04/26 @ 9:54 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Zaire ndyabagye

7/04/26 @ 9:54 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Eugene Martinez

7/04/26 @ 9:54 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Raymon Martin

7/04/26 @ 9:54 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Deborah Riley

7/04/26 @ 9:54 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Ryan Patnode

7/04/26 @ 9:54 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Laquinton Dorrough

7/04/26 @ 9:53 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Alycia Montego

7/04/26 @ 9:53 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Dana Gonzales

7/04/26 @ 9:53 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Eli Chama

7/04/26 @ 9:53 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Anthony Bowser

7/04/26 @ 9:53 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Isaac Vallejos

7/04/26 @ 9:53 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Sammuel Munoz

7/04/26 @ 9:53 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Gustavo Piarra

7/04/26 @ 9:53 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Minerva Lopez

7/04/26 @ 9:53 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Bob Hill

7/04/26 @ 9:53 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Billy Delores

7/04/26 @ 9:53 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Jorge Sanchez

7/04/26 @ 9:53 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Lorraine Bott

7/04/26 @ 9:52 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Wayne Pellegrni

7/04/26 @ 9:52 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Tammy Aguilar

7/04/26 @ 9:51 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Josephine Darthard

7/04/26 @ 9:51 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Lanette Tomten

7/04/26 @ 9:51 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Alondra Espinoza

7/04/26 @ 9:51 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Clovis Boatright

7/04/26 @ 9:51 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Priscilla Montano

7/04/26 @ 9:51 AM

I will support this cause,we all need to think of our future

No attachments

Comment From: Susanna Delgado

7/04/26 @ 9:51 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Richard Bombin

7/04/26 @ 9:51 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Alex Rivera

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Adrian Rios

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Adrian Oledo

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Camm Bradfield

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Richard Bombin

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

I like how many jobs this brings- Richard Bombin

No attachments

Comment From: Susanna Delgado

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: James Ortiz

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Caitlynn Gonzalez

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Susanna Delgado

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Jake Bennet

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Magen-Rose Edwards

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Aaron Two Crow

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Juan Payan

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Mercedes Morales

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Josephine Otero

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Ignacio Regalado

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Kevin Moose

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Mario Guzman

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Luxy River

7/04/26 @ 9:50 AM

I am writing to express my support for Project Jupiter, which I believe offers significant benefits for our community.
I heard that this would help with jobs and our state taxes, so I want this to come.

Sincerely,
Luxy river

No attachments

Comment From: Jerome Gallegos

7/04/26 @ 9:49 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Zev Ratigan

7/04/26 @ 9:49 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Dylan Deleon

7/04/26 @ 9:49 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Michael Reinig

7/04/26 @ 9:49 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Martin Lopez

7/04/26 @ 9:49 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Zariah Harris

7/04/26 @ 9:49 AM

Keep up the good work I love all the info he gave I support the cause!

No attachments

Comment From: Alan Ortiz

7/04/26 @ 9:49 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Diana Munoz

7/04/26 @ 9:49 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Jameson Palmer

7/04/26 @ 9:49 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Phillip Hopkins

7/04/26 @ 9:49 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Michael Smiley

7/04/26 @ 9:49 AM

I am writing to express my support for Project Jupiter, which I believe offers significant benefits for our community.

I want it as long they are really the fuel cell like this young man just told me about I'm all for it.

Sincerely,
Michael sm...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Dylan Deleon

7/04/26 @ 9:49 AM

No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]