Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC-YGI Microgrid Air Quality Construction Permit Application

Comment From: Elle Tiongson

7/04/26 @ 2:52 PM

This is not right

No attachments

Comment From: Chance Fleming

7/04/26 @ 2:52 PM

I'm going to make one thing very clear there will be no data center here. Whether we beat you guys legislatively or we burn it down to the fucking ground there will be no data center, I assure you.

No attachments

Comment From: Riley Leger

7/04/26 @ 2:51 PM

The greed and hatred for others that one must have to want this to be built is astounding. What will you do when there are no more people to use this tech and fill your pockets?? What will you do when there is no more ocean to exploit? What will you ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Ted Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:51 PM

I oppose project Jupiter in its entirety. I oppose the construction of a data centre in an area already lacking water. I oppose the construction of a mass polluter of greenhouse gases. I oppose the construction of a building granted planning permissi...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Graceline Ellis

7/04/26 @ 2:51 PM

This is harmful to our environment, we do not want data centers. Save the earth. This is harmful to our environment, we do not want data centers. Save the earth.

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quali...↓

No attachments

Comment From: betsy romero mejía

7/04/26 @ 2:50 PM

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. ...↓How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution? A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC. A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit.This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance. We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence. Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilment of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: Dezere Garrett

7/04/26 @ 2:50 PM

I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home.

No attachments

Comment From: Marit NA

7/04/26 @ 2:50 PM

Fuck project Jupiter

No attachments

Comment From: Ishan Mankad

7/04/26 @ 2:49 PM

I would prefer if this project pays for its own electricity it's only right... I don't want to pay more electricity bills

No attachments

Comment From: Zun Anon

7/04/26 @ 2:49 PM

I just love the environment and will do anything and everything to help

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit applicat...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Riley Maloney

7/04/26 @ 2:49 PM

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. ...↓How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution? A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC. A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance. We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence. Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilment of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: Sophia Rodunhaeusor

7/04/26 @ 2:49 PM

I am a resident of Spain and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and sec...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Olivia Walker

7/04/26 @ 2:48 PM

STOP KILLING THE PLANET. The only reason I wake up everyday is because of what the world gives me. Your jobs are all lies, they last for a year and then you move on. You barely fill those centers once they are built. It's NOT sustainable. It causes m...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Alo Declined

7/04/26 @ 2:48 PM

Ay Que ayudar al planeta para las futuras generationes no exterminarlo yo quiero que mi futura familia pueda vivir con aire limpio y que puedan ver las Estrella's en la trade ser y en la noche. Yo quiero lo mejor para mi gente

"The public should be ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Ella Morissette

7/04/26 @ 2:48 PM

I am a resident of Calgary Alberta Canada and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they ha...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Megan Walsh

7/04/26 @ 2:48 PM

We don't need data centers to fuel AI that will destroy our planets climate and ecosystems. AI is a helpful tool but it is not needed/required for humans to do our jobs. We need water and a healthy planet to live, we DO NOT NEED AI.

No attachments

Comment From: Virginie Larouche

7/04/26 @ 2:47 PM

Dear NMED staff, I am writting because I'm concern about the risk and harms project Jupiter poses to our world. I am submitting this comment to urge the New Mexico Environment Departement to reject Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC's air permit applic...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Kassidy Frazier

7/04/26 @ 2:47 PM

I do not believe tat building a huge data center will do anything but continue to harm our environment and trying to make us believe that it will is sick and money hungry. You can't make money in a world that is dead.

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:46 PM

I live in Southern Doña Ana County and under no circumstances do I want experimental technology deployed at an unprecedented scale in my backyard. Yucca Growth Infrastructure's gas-powered fuel cell plant is 1,000 times larger than Bloom Energy's big...↓gest existing fuel cell plant. In fact, worldwide, Bloom Energy has developed 1.4 GW of fuel cell technology across more than a thousand locations, yet Yucca Growth Infrastructure is asking for nearly double that (2.46 GW of fuel cells) at a singular location. The largest fuel cell plant in the entire world is more than 30 times smaller than the fuel cell plant under consideration in Santa Teresa. There is absolutely no way to know, with certainty, what the actual pollution levels will be given the tremendous size differential, and thus gap in data, between operational fuel cell plants and this theoretical plant proposed by Yucca Growth Infrastructure. Betting the livability of our county on this unpredictable and unproven plan would be a total capitulation and betrayal of your so-called values: "protects the public health of New Mexicans...by preventing the deterioration of air quality;" "protect and restore the environment...foster a healthy NM for present and future generations" Though approximations of annual air pollution were provided, the testing used an extremely weak methodology leaving us, ultimately, with pseudoscientific guesses that have large margins of error. Estimated pollution levels for this gas-powered fuel cell plant are based on only three 4-hour pollution tests from a very small unit (only 65 kW). This is a far cry from thousands of sweltering fuel cells operating 24/7 at maximum output in close proximity, all in the scorching heat of our open desert. The lack of rigorous testing at even this small of a scale is lazy and very concerning, especially given that the gas power plant Yucca Growth Infrastructure wants to build is 37,000 times bigger than this unit. A 15% "safety margin" was added to thenumbers provided by the applicant. Safety margins are not usually added if a company is confident in the accuracy of their pollution estimates. Even small variations from this superficial test will result in massively different levels of pollution and given that the plant will be 37,000 bigger than the testing unit, a 15% safety margin is completely insufficient–it could work as a margin for a single unit, but not the entire plant. If a unit has a 0.01% chance of failing (sounds promising right?), the odds of 37,000 of those units working perfectly at the same time is 2.47% (pathetically low feasibility). That means there is a 97.53% chance that the plant will experience at least one failure. What will the exact level of redundancy be? Will more fuel cells be rubberstamped or pollution levels overlooked in five years or less due to age-related inefficiencies? What about cases of catastrophic failure? Are we approving those deadly incidents of pollution in advance without any real data informing us of the risks at this scale? Highly flammable hydrogen under high pressure only needs a microscopic crack to leak out, ignite, explode, and level entire neighborhoods and schools while sending shockwaves into nearby counties. Assuming this risk, an act of gross negligence, at a scale that has never even remotely been demonstrated in practice would be unbelievably careless. These permits must be denied outright. If further deliberation is desired, a public hearing in Santa Teresa is non-negotiable."The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. Approving this permit would be government-sponsored environmental racism directed at residents of Doña Ana County.
If the permit is not denied outright, a public hearing needs to be held in Santa Teresa, in both English and Spanish, with an option to participate virtually."

No attachments

Comment From: Jahziah Sims

7/04/26 @ 2:46 PM

Protect the earth

No attachments

Comment From: Alexis Bertozzi

7/04/26 @ 2:46 PM

The carbon dioxide pollution alone will heat our atmosphere at a much faster pace and promote the formation of even more ground-level ozone. Last summer, many children across the U.S. suffered a grand mal seizure while on the playgrounds at school be...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Marin n/a

7/04/26 @ 2:46 PM

I am a citizen of Silver City and I strongly appose project Jupiter. This risks the livelihood of our future and future generations. This project will ruin New Mexico. You are putting our health at risk. The public should be given an additional 60 da...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Emma Milburn

7/04/26 @ 2:46 PM

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. ...↓How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution? A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC. A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance. We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence. Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: Claire Kaminski

7/04/26 @ 2:46 PM

My name is Claire Kaminski and I am a citizen of the United States. It is a privilege to be a thriving species on this planet, it is amazing that we are such intelligent beings who have the capabilities to make amazing huge changes in the world. What...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:45 PM

I live in Southern Doña Ana County and under no circumstances do I want experimental technology deployed at an unprecedented scale in my backyard. Yucca Growth Infrastructure's gas-powered fuel cell plant is 1,000 times larger than Bloom Energy's big...↓gest existing fuel cell plant. In fact, worldwide, Bloom Energy has developed 1.4 GW of fuel cell technology across more than a thousand locations, yet Yucca Growth Infrastructure is asking for nearly double that (2.46 GW of fuel cells) at a singular location. The largest fuel cell plant in the entire world is more than 30 times smaller than the fuel cell plant under consideration in Santa Teresa. There is absolutely no way to know, with certainty, what the actual pollution levels will be given the tremendous size differential, and thus gap in data, between operational fuel cell plants and this theoretical plant proposed by Yucca Growth Infrastructure. Betting the livability of our county on this unpredictable and unproven plan would be a total capitulation and betrayal of your so-called values: "protects the public health of New Mexicans...by preventing the deterioration of air quality;" "protect and restore the environment...foster a healthy NM for present and future generations" Though approximations of annual air pollution were provided, the testing used an extremely weak methodology leaving us, ultimately, with pseudoscientific guesses that have large margins of error. Estimated pollution levels for this gas-powered fuel cell plant are based on only three 4-hour pollution tests from a very small unit (only 65 kW). This is a far cry from thousands of sweltering fuel cells operating 24/7 at maximum output in close proximity, all in the scorching heat of our open desert. The lack of rigorous testing at even this small of a scale is lazy and very concerning, especially given that the gas power plant Yucca Growth Infrastructure wants to build is 37,000 times bigger than this unit. A 15% "safety margin" was added to the
numbers provided by the applicant. Safety margins are not usually added if a company is confident in the accuracy of their pollution estimates. Even small variations from this superficial test will result in massively different levels of pollution and given that the plant will be 37,000 bigger than the testing unit, a 15% safety margin is completely insufficient–it could work as a margin for a single unit, but not the entire plant. If a unit has a 0.01% chance of failing (sounds promising right?), the odds of 37,000 of those units working perfectly at the same time is 2.47% (pathetically low feasibility). That means there is a 97.53% chance that the plant will experience at least one failure. What will the exact level of redundancy be? Will more fuel cells be rubberstamped or pollution levels overlooked in five years or less due to age-related inefficiencies? What about cases of catastrophic failure? Are we approving those deadly incidents of pollution in advance without any real data informing us of the risks at this scale? Highly flammable hydrogen under high pressure only needs a microscopic crack to leak out, ignite, explode, and level entire neighborhoods and schools while sending shockwaves into nearby counties. Assuming this risk, an act of gross negligence, at a scale that has never even remotely been demonstrated in practice would be unbelievably careless. These permits must be denied outright. If further deliberation is desired, a public hearing in Santa Teresa is non-negotiable.

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. Approving this permit would be government-sponsored environmental racism directed at residents of Doña Ana County.
If the permit is not denied outright, a public hearing needs to be held in Santa Teresa, in both English and Spanish, with an option to participate virtually."

No attachments

Comment From: Luca Ingeli

7/04/26 @ 2:45 PM

We didn't need AI before, we don't need it now. There are unemployed people out there who would happily do those jobs while being able to survive and not killing the enviroment.

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:44 PM

Project Jupiter will take away water that is needed for our communities to survive and with more carbon going into the air it causes more climate change to happen leading to terrible weather and natural disasters. Ai also steals our jobs and takes jo...↓

No attachments

Comment From: A'Jhani Whitaker

7/04/26 @ 2:44 PM

By building this data center you are putting our future at risk. You will destroy the water needed for drinking, desert needed for wildlife to inhabit, and you will you will cause climate change to worsen. You are ruining our planet! There is only on...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Enzo Vigil

7/04/26 @ 2:44 PM

New Mexico does not have enough water to support this. It will harm the local communities and ecosystems surrounding it. The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can partici...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Vilde Rakstang

7/04/26 @ 2:44 PM

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal du...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Jade Lea

7/04/26 @ 2:44 PM

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably. The air quality permit application should be denied given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazar...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Callie Moore

7/04/26 @ 2:43 PM

STOP DRILLING AND USING AI!! We were able to go without ai before and we can do it again. If people are so about making America great again- why do we need to keep hurting it?? When will we make it good?? Why why why are we killing the ONLY livable p...↓

No attachments

Comment From: NA NA

7/04/26 @ 2:43 PM

NEW MEXICO DOES NOT NEED AN AI DATA CENTER!!

No attachments

Comment From: Alaysia Kirkland

7/04/26 @ 2:43 PM

We do not need AI to survive. I am not picking somebody to do things for me. That is quite literally making the world worse than what I can do for it which is better cause I'm not gonna be lazy. I'm not trying to let things get me thinking that I'm s...↓

No attachments

Comment From: anonymous anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:43 PM

your new data base is gonna make climate change even more worse and hotter and YOU'RE GONNA ENDANGER THE POLAR BEARS AND ALL THE ANIMALS THAT AEE TRYING TO SURVIVE IN THE ARCTIC. if you go on with this i hope you're glad with all the animals you kill...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Hélèna Berard

7/04/26 @ 2:42 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Heather Morton

7/04/26 @ 2:42 PM

OPPOSED!

I am resubmitting directly, after originally submitting my comment with a PJ canvasser, and it was never submitted to the portal. I was assured it would be posted, even as an "opposed" comment. The canvasser assured me she had submitted ma...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Camila Hernandez

7/04/26 @ 2:42 PM

I am Camila Hernandez and I want to ask that you would deny the "Project Jupiter" because it will use all of the clean water that us humans need to survive. You aren't helping the world with your data center you are killing it. - Thank you

No attachments

Comment From: Anon Anon

7/04/26 @ 2:42 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Serenity-Kai Valenzuela

7/04/26 @ 2:42 PM

I am a resident of CA and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and secure...↓ future. That future is under threat with this proposed air quality permit. A change to fuel cells has minimal impacts on the suffering we will endure as a result of the gas plant's air pollution. To add 10 million tons of carbon dioxide pollution and a vague estimate of toxic emissions to our active and long-time nonattainment zone would be nothing short of blatant environmental racism. Our metro area is currently 16th worst in the nation for ozone pollution and we have received a failing grade on this air quality standard every single year since 2000. We are already breathing some of the most compromised air in the country. It is unacceptable to invite a new source of hyperscale air pollution into our communities. The carbon dioxide pollution alone will heat our atmosphere at a much faster pace and promote the formation of even more ground-level ozone. Last summer, my 7 year old suffered a grand mal seizure while on the playground at school because the extreme heat led to electrolyte imbalances. My brother works outside everyday without shade or rest breaks and has nowhere to keep his insulin cool. I can barely pay my electricity bills in the summer as it is. We cannot afford more intense heat. The other toxic air pollutants are extremely dangerous–many of them at very low levels. How am I supposed to send my kids to school knowing what they are breathing in? Knowing it can cause permanent brain damage or breathing complications before they have had a chance to grow up. Fuel cells also create hazardous waste and the fuel cell provider for this project has a history of illegally dumping this waste and hiding it for several years. This company will likely repeat its bad habits, illegally dumping dangerous and undisclosed chemicals into our public landfills, and we will just have to wait until somebody notices? Our county has and continues to face an illegal dumping epidemic so how can I be sure that these systemic oversight failures we have locally won't continue and expand to include this dangerous and experimental fuel cell operation. A fine for illegal dumping does not undo damage or its spread once our aquifer and soils are contaminated. It also will not re-capture the volatile chemicals that are released into the air when hazardous waste is improperly stored and disposed of.

My family's health and safety should be worth more than the profits of out-of-state corporations. The only defensible options moving forward are to deny this air permit or you must hold a public hearing in-person in Santa Teresa with a component for virtual participation. Materials and the hearing itself must be translated into Spanish and meet any other accessibility needs requested by community members.

No attachments

Comment From: Ricardo Martinez

7/04/26 @ 2:42 PM

Dear NMED staff, My name is Ricardo Martinez. I live in Santa Fe, and I am writing because I am concerned about the risks and harms Project Jupiter poses to New Mexicans. I am submitting this comment to urge the New Mexico Environment Department to r...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Marie Thai

7/04/26 @ 2:41 PM

NO MORE A.I DATA CENTERS!! The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution contro...↓

No attachments

Comment From: John Paul Palomino

7/04/26 @ 2:41 PM

This data center will be a hit to the local ecology that it cannot afford.

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit appl...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anon Anon

7/04/26 @ 2:41 PM

I am a resident of Cartersville, Ga. I've lived in only one other state, but two other cities. not only is this the last generation able to do something about climate change. we're the ones getting it the worst. the world has prospered without the us...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:41 PM

I live in Southern Doña Ana County and under no circumstances do I want experimental technology deployed at an unprecedented scale in my backyard. Yucca Growth Infrastructure's gas-powered fuel cell plant is 1,000 times larger than Bloom Energy's big...↓gest existing fuel cell plant. In fact, worldwide, Bloom Energy has developed 1.4 GW of fuel cell technology across more than a thousand locations, yet Yucca Growth Infrastructure is asking for nearly double that (2.46 GW of fuel cells) at a singular location. The largest fuel cell plant in the entire world is more than 30 times smaller than the fuel cell plant under consideration in Santa Teresa. There is absolutely no way to know, with certainty, what the actual pollution levels will be given the tremendous size differential, and thus gap in data, between operational fuel cell plants and this theoretical plant proposed by Yucca Growth Infrastructure. Betting the livability of our county on this unpredictable and unproven plan would be a total capitulation and betrayal of your so-called values: "protects the public health of New Mexicans...by preventing the deterioration of air quality;" "protect and restore the environment...foster a healthy NM for present and future generations" Though approximations of annual air pollution were provided, the testing used an extremely weak methodology leaving us, ultimately, with pseudoscientific guesses that have large margins of error. Estimated pollution levels for this gas-powered fuel cell plant are based on only three 4-hour pollution tests from a very small unit (only 65 kW). This is a far cry from thousands of sweltering fuel cells operating 24/7 at maximum output in close proximity, all in the scorching heat of our open desert. The lack of rigorous testing at even this small of a scale is lazy and very concerning, especially given that the gas power plant Yucca Growth Infrastructure wants to build is 37,000 times bigger than this unit. A 15% "safety margin" was added to the numbers provided by the applicant. Safety margins are not usually added if a company is confident in the accuracy of their pollution estimates. Even small variations from this superficial test will result in massively different levels of pollution and given that the plant will be 37,000 bigger than the testing unit, a 15% safety margin is completely insufficient–it could work as a margin for a single unit, but not the entire plant. If a unit has a 0.01% chance of failing (sounds promising right?), the odds of 37,000 of those units working perfectly at the same time is 2.47% (pathetically low feasibility). That means there is a 97.53% chance that the plant will experience at least one failure. What will the exact level of redundancy be? Will more fuel cells be rubberstamped or pollution levels overlooked in five years or less due to age-related inefficiencies? What about cases of catastrophic failure? Are we approving those deadly incidents of pollution in advance without any real data informing us of the risks at this scale? Highly flammable hydrogen under high pressure only needs a microscopic crack to leak out, ignite, explode, and level entire neighborhoods and schools while sending shockwaves into nearby counties. Assuming this risk, an act of gross negligence, at a scale that has never even remotely been demonstrated in practice would be unbelievably careless. These permits must be denied outright. If further deliberation is desired, a public hearing in Santa Teresa is non-negotiable.

No attachments

Comment From: Paige Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:41 PM

Project Jupiter will have devastating effects on the environment and our people. The permit that is being requested needs to be denied. We are already seeing the impacts on the environment with the construction, imagine how much worse it will get whe...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Antonio King

7/04/26 @ 2:40 PM

I do not support the detriment of our environment. The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied o...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Ethen Halpern

7/04/26 @ 2:40 PM

Why are we letting them do this?
The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloo...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Maureen Beacom

7/04/26 @ 2:40 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:39 PM

STOP PROJECT JUPITER. The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Jasmine Hayes

7/04/26 @ 2:39 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Oyu Erdene

7/04/26 @ 2:39 PM

Pls no i need the earth to live gng.

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given...↓

No attachments

Comment From: A Born and Raised New Mexican Declined

7/04/26 @ 2:38 PM

Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you. If further deliberation is desired, a public hearing in Santa Teresa is non-negotiable. Betting the livab...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Samyr Chrispin

7/04/26 @ 2:38 PM

This data center will just worsen our climate and live of the communities around it, we do not need and do not want it. The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can particip...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Dolkar Sherpa

7/04/26 @ 2:38 PM

I am a resident of Oakland and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and s...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Drew James

7/04/26 @ 2:37 PM

PLEASE STOP CREATING MORE AI CENTERS ITS RUINING THE PLANET AND IT'S UNNECESSARY. PLEASE!! The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quali...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:37 PM

Trusting an AI data Centre to not cause much damage is like leaving your property in the Hands of a well known theif. Project Jupiter is going to cause severe damage which will take generations to fix. Abstain from going for it at all costs because i...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Madeline E

7/04/26 @ 2:37 PM

I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and secure future. That future is un...↓der threat with this proposed air quality permit. A change to fuel cells has minimal impacts on the suffering we will endure as a result of the gas plant's air pollution. To add 10 million tons of carbon dioxide pollution and a vague estimate of toxic emissions to our active and long-time nonattainment zone would be nothing short of blatant environmental racism. Our metro area is currently 16th worst in the nation for ozone pollution and we have received a failing grade on this air quality standard every single year since 2000. We are already breathing some of the most compromised air in the country. It is unacceptable to invite a new source of hyperscale air pollution into our communities. The carbon dioxide pollution alone will heat our atmosphere at a much faster pace and promote the formation of even more ground-level ozone. Last summer, my 7 year old suffered a grand mal seizure while on the playground at school because the extreme heat led to electrolyte imbalances. My brother works outside everyday without shade or rest breaks and has nowhere to keep his insulin cool. I can barely pay my electricity bills in the summer as it is. We cannot afford more intense heat. The other toxic air pollutants are extremely dangerous–many of them at very low levels. How am I supposed to send my kids to school knowing what they are breathing in? Knowing it can cause permanent brain damage or breathing complications before they have had a chance to grow up. Fuel cells also create hazardous waste and the fuel cell provider for this project has a history of illegally dumping this waste and hiding it for several years. This company will likely repeat its bad habits, illegally dumping dangerous and undisc

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. Approving this permit would be government-sponsored environmental racism directed at residents of Doña Ana County.
If the permit is not denied outright, a public hearing needs to be held in Santa Teresa, in both English and Spanish, with an option to participate virtually."

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:37 PM

We don't need to hurt our planet further with violent chemicals and waste space with a center large enough to cover half a town. AI is not so revolutionary to be worth taking away drinking water from a community or three. And if you can't see that, i...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Jorge Reyes

7/04/26 @ 2:36 PM

Estimado personal de NMED: Mi nombre es Jorge Reyes, vivo en Santa Fe y les escribo porque me preocupan los riesgos y daños que el Proyecto Júpiter representa para los habitantes de Nuevo México. Presento este comentario para instar al Departamento d...↓e Medio Ambiente de Nuevo México a rechazar la solicitud de permiso de emisiones atmosféricas de Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC para la microrred YGI en el condado de Doña Ana. Me preocupa mucho el medio ambiente y mi país, y este proyecto va en contra de mis creencias, perjudica al país y al medio ambiente. Apenas tenemos agua y este proyecto va a consumir la poca agua que nos. En nombre de mi comunidad, insto al Departamento de Medio Ambiente de Nuevo México a rechazar la solicitud de permiso de emisiones atmosféricas de Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC para la microrred YGI. Si el Departamento no rechaza el permiso, solicito que se celebre una audiencia pública bilingüe cerca de la comunidad de Santa Teresa, para que los residentes puedan informarse sobre los riesgos asociados con la tecnología de celdas de combustible. El Departamento debería otorgar al público 60 días adicionales para revisar la solicitud y presentar comentarios, a fin de garantizar que todos puedan participar y expresar sus opiniones de manera constructiva. La red eléctrica propuesta, alimentada por celdas de combustible, genera preocupación por varias razones: Seguiría produciendo altos niveles de gases de efecto invernadero y contaminantes tóxicos. Esta tecnología genera residuos tóxicos, y el proceso para su manejo aún no está claro. Nunca se ha probado la tecnología de celdas de combustible ni un sistema centralizado de gestión de residuos a esta escala. La calidad del aire de las comunidades aledañas se verá gravemente afectada por este proyecto.

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. Approving this permit would be government-sponsored environmental racism directed at residents of Doña Ana County.
If the permit is not denied outright, a public hearing needs to be held in Santa Teresa, in both English and Spanish, with an option to participate virtually."

No attachments

Comment From: Gabriella Pongracz

7/04/26 @ 2:36 PM

We need to stop the AI use because it's harming not only our planet but the animals that surround it. The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
Th...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:36 PM

New Mexico is not the place for this. Asthma rates are up and my parents are supposed to grow old here. The drought and heatwaves will get increasingly worse until it is not safe to live here. The companies' behavior has already demonstrated that it ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anon Anon

7/04/26 @ 2:36 PM

If projects like this keep happening, we're not going to have essential supplies that every living thing on Earth needs to survive. AI centers already use up so much water as it is, and if we keep going in this direction we won't be able to live long...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:36 PM

ai data centers are unnecessarily using up resources like water and land and causing issues for residents, this particular center will be the largest and cause water unavailability for people living in water scarce areas already.

No attachments

Comment From: Amelia Leyva

7/04/26 @ 2:36 PM

We do not need this. We don't need ai because we have lived without it before and we were doing good. The rise of ai has destroyed many things like our planet and has made kids dumber because of how they use ai for all of their school work. AI can li...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Bruna Magalhães

7/04/26 @ 2:35 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Tanya Valle

7/04/26 @ 2:35 PM

Planet Jupitor will disrupt the ecosystem, to us humans, as well as animals. Planet Jupitor is something the community does not want! This will interfere with the people's water, animals ecosystems, as well as habitats. This will effect everyone, we ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Benjamin Anderson

7/04/26 @ 2:34 PM

WE DO NOT WANT A DATA CENTER!! The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anon Anon

7/04/26 @ 2:34 PM

I am a resident of New Mexico and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. This is my home, and I want to continue living safely and securely with the possibility to have a family here knowing they have a safe and s...↓ecure future. That future is under threat with this proposed air quality permit. A change to fuel cells has minimal impacts on the suffering we will endure as a result of the gas plant's air pollution. To add 10 million tons of carbon dioxide pollution and a vague estimate of toxic emissions to our active and long-time nonattainment zone would be nothing short of blatant environmental racism. Our metro area is currently 16th worst in the nation for ozone pollution and we have received a failing grade on this air quality standard every single year since 2000. We are already breathing some of the most compromised air in the country. It is unacceptable to invite a new source of hyperscale air pollution into our communities. Fuel cells also create hazardous waste and the fuel cell provider for this project has a history of illegally dumping this waste and hiding it for several years. This company will likely repeat its bad habits, illegally dumping dangerous and undisclosed chemicals into our public landfills, and we will just have to wait until somebody notices? Our county has and continues to face an illegal dumping epidemic so how can I be sure that these systemic oversight failures we have locally won't continue and expand to include this dangerous and experimental fuel cell operation. A fine for illegal dumping does not undo damage or its spread once our aquifer and soils are contaminated. It also will not re-capture the volatile chemicals that are released into the air when hazardous waste is improperly stored and disposed of. New Mexican's health and safety should be worth more than the profits of out-of-state corporations. The only defensible options moving forward are to deny this air permit or you must hold a public hearing in-person in Santa Teresa with a component for virtual participation. Materials and the hearing itself must be translated into Spanish and meet any other accessibility needs requested by community members.

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. Approving this permit would be government-sponsored environmental racism directed at residents of Doña Ana County.
If the permit is not denied outright, a public hearing needs to be held in Santa Teresa, in both English and Spanish, with an option to participate virtually.

No attachments

Comment From: Kris Thomas

7/04/26 @ 2:34 PM

Stop Project Jupiter!

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy'...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Daniel Rockey

7/04/26 @ 2:34 PM

This is detrimental to our planet and sacrifices the future of not only humans, but life on Earth. It is outrageous that this project would sacrifice the local communities for profit. The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and com...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Margot Carette

7/04/26 @ 2:34 PM

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dum...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:34 PM

Sample 1 — Health impacts of air pollution & hazardous waste I am a resident of the United States and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I w...↓

No attachments

Comment From: My Martin

7/04/26 @ 2:33 PM

I am submitting this comment to share my opposition to the Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC-YGI Microgrid Air Quality Construction Permit Application. Please deny this application for the following reasons: *YGI's application should be denied by NMED...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:33 PM

Project Jupiter's power plant will release up to 10 million tons of climate-warming greenhouse gasses every year. This would make a mockery of NM's climate goals, and erase most of the climate progress we have made in the last two decades.

"The publ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Dominic Nanni

7/04/26 @ 2:33 PM

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dum...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Andrea S

7/04/26 @ 2:32 PM

We do not want a data center polluting our air and increasing the heat and water shortage in NM.

The unique wildlife of southern nm and already hot climate would suffer if this is allowed to be built.
"The public should be given an additional 60 day...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Elise Gonzales

7/04/26 @ 2:32 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:32 PM

I am far from this country but hearing about this issue? made me have to write this comment, the doomsday clock already ticks lower and lower by the second— instead of the economy helping maintain atleast few more seconds that clock has, they decide ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Serenity Jackson

7/04/26 @ 2:32 PM

STOP KILLING OUR PLANET! IF WE RUN OUT OF WATER, DO YOU! The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be de...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Vilma Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:32 PM

Project Jupiter will affect the whole world. Stop the project.

New Mexico Environment Department should give the public an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.

The air q...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Valeria Mejía

7/04/26 @ 2:31 PM

I thank yall for doing this. Our planet need more people like me,

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application s...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Luna Rodriguez

7/04/26 @ 2:31 PM

I vehemently oppose Project Jupiter as it is unconscionable to destroy local communities and our planet at large for a project that will add absolutely no value. It will not create long term jobs, but it will ruin precious and important nature, and i...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Christopher Begley

7/04/26 @ 2:31 PM

Save our earth

No attachments

Comment From: Tamia Spicer

7/04/26 @ 2:31 PM

I am a resident of the United States of America and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing t...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Izzy Garcia

7/04/26 @ 2:30 PM

Stop A.I. Stop Data centres. There's no "good AI" if all its doing is hurting the environment and hurting humans in more ways then one. AI is human's suicide. Don't be suicidal.

No attachments

Comment From: Lauren Carrell

7/04/26 @ 2:30 PM

were so screwed already but i wanna try and help our air im so happy i saw this tiktok

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Madolin Lamb

7/04/26 @ 2:30 PM

Our world is on a fast track to the end. We have limited resources as is and this is disgusting. You take water from animals and trees that we need to survive. Soon we will run out of usable oxygen because companies think money is more important than...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Regan Dyer

7/04/26 @ 2:30 PM

Issues with pollution monitoring & lack of controls The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO ...↓proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution? A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC. A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much?
If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance. We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence. Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilment of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: Laurie Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:29 PM

I am a resident of VA and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. Our future is under threat with this proposed air quality permit. A change to fuel cells has minimal impacts on the suffering we will endure as a re...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Catalina Bustos

7/04/26 @ 2:29 PM

Dear NMED staff, My name is Catalina Bustos. I live in San Juan, Argentina, and I am writing because I am concerned about the risks and harms Project Jupiter poses to New Mexicans. I am submitting this comment to urge the New Mexico Environment Depar...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Zyana Benjamin

7/04/26 @ 2:29 PM

This "project" will ruin our water supply and our land. The environment around us cannot sustain this level of abuse on its resources. This is a danger to our communities in New Mexico. The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and c...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Kit Williamson

7/04/26 @ 2:29 PM

STOP PROJECT JUPITER STOP PROJECT JUPITER The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright g...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Sophia Oprat

7/04/26 @ 2:28 PM

This is a data center that requires a million gallons of water to keep running each day. Is this not excessive? Is it not enough? When is enough? We have survived for years without ai and similar types of technology. There are more environmental frie...↓

No attachments

Comment From: NA NA

7/04/26 @ 2:28 PM

I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and secure future. That future is under threat with this proposed air quality permit. A change to fuel cells has minimal impacts on the suffering we will endure as a result of the g...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Yoli arellano

7/04/26 @ 2:27 PM

Project Jupiter should be stopped because it could have harmful effects on the Earth and the environment. Large industrial projects often require huge amounts of energy, land, and natural resources. If they are not carefully managed, they can increas...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Cassie M

7/04/26 @ 2:27 PM

I want to grow up in a world where water is not scarce, where the air is clean, and where I know my children and their children don't have to worry about the same concerns.
The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Simon Ashton

7/04/26 @ 2:27 PM

Do not do this, I honestly don't think Project Jupiter should happen. The risks seem way bigger than any potential benefits, and once something like that is set in motion, it's almost impossible to undo the consequences. If there's even a chance it c...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Soot Ash

7/04/26 @ 2:27 PM

This is a very serious matter and our water is key to to your survival. Stop this project

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 2:27 PM

As a student in the states myself, i cant even imagine having to listen to the constant sound of humming coming from an unnecessary 'infrastructure.' The project is completely worthless, serving little, if not NO purpose at all. From reading other co...↓mments someone states, 'Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health...' I completely agree with them. Children, wildlife, and the elderly are VULNERABLE and FRAGILE. Children are at their peak of development, learning social interactions, learning, etc. Imagine how their learning and social interaction would be disturbed if Project Jupiter were to happen. Elderly should have peace, obviously as they are at their most vulnerable state where their senses are very sensitive along with the wildlife, varying from ages young and old especially with the fact that many species would be endangered because of the MASSIVE plot of land their A.I data center is taking up. Us humans do not need artificial intelligence to function, in fact its became a negative to humans as its been scientifically proven to shorten attention span ad it often givens an immediate answer, have students becoming to dependent and reliant on A.I. This is exactly what the government, in my opinion, wants. They want us to be deprived of knowledge, becoming more reliant on A.I which they could possibly then be manipulated into giving false answers. Using our clean water and electricity in the process, and for what..? Many people may not care until its too late, but when people finally realize that the government truly doesn't care, they will finally be seeing the rich living their life while the lower class has to watch and suffer from not fighting back and not speaking up. People must realize theres power in numbers.

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. Approving this permit would be government-sponsored environmental racism directed at residents of Doña Ana County.
If the permit is not denied outright, a public hearing needs to be held in Santa Teresa, in both English and Spanish, with an option to participate virtually."

No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]