Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC-YGI Microgrid Air Quality Construction Permit Application

Comment From: Sierra Sorensen

7/04/26 @ 4:38 PM

I strongly oppose Project Jupiter and the continued expansion of large-scale data centers. We have reached a point where our planet cannot continue sacrificing more land, more water, and more energy to support endless digital growth. Instead of build...↓

No attachments

Comment From: AJ Schinco

7/04/26 @ 4:38 PM

We've lived without AI for thousands of years. SAVE THE PLANET SO WE CAN CONTINUE LIVING. Stop killing our planet so some artificial being can thrive.

New Mexico Environment Department should give the public an additional 60 days to review and comme...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anon Anon

7/04/26 @ 4:38 PM

I am a resident of one of New Mexico's neighboring states and I ask you to please put an end to this new data center. Not only has AI scientifically been proven to be a climate change threat, but also a noisemaker and a significant threat of liveliho...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Avery Hicks

7/04/26 @ 4:37 PM

WE DONT NEED AI TO LIVE WE WANT WATER FOR ALL. HUMANITY DEPENDS ON WATER FOR SURVIVAL WE SHOULDNT BE DYING OF THIRST BECAUSE THE GREEDY ELITES WANT MORE MONEY.

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anon Anon

7/04/26 @ 4:34 PM

I am only eighteen and scared for my future because of the pollution and contamination caused by these data centers. My family is scared to bring children into this world, fearing what they would have to go through in their lives. I am already compro...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anon Anon

7/04/26 @ 4:32 PM

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. ...↓How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution? A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC. A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance.

We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence.

Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: Luci Wittner-Kaufman

7/04/26 @ 4:32 PM

I live in Albuquerque and am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. It poses health risks due to air pollution and hazardous waste given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. It is not safe for New...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Angie Kaufman

7/04/26 @ 4:31 PM

Attachments:

Download

Comment From: Roger Bautista- Jimenez

7/04/26 @ 4:30 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 4:30 PM

Dear NMED staff, My name is V. I am NOT a New Mexico resident, but I am living in El Paso, and I am writing because I am concerned about the risks and harms Project Jupiter poses to New Mexicans. I am submitting this comment to urge the New Mexico En...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Grace M

7/04/26 @ 4:29 PM

I don't live near where the data center is being built but I know what the effects will be on the people who do. I care too much about my fellow man to not speak out for them. Building this data center will harm vulnerable communities. People will fa...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Ashaanka Sarma

7/04/26 @ 4:28 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Anon Anon

7/04/26 @ 4:28 PM

I do not want AI data centers because they ruin the environment, with this size of a data center, it will definitely hurt the environment a lot. Me and others do not want data centers, we were fine without the overuse of Artificial Intelligence. I kn...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anon Anon

7/04/26 @ 4:26 PM

I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and secure future. That future is un...↓der threat with this proposed air quality permit. A change to fuel cells has minimal impacts on the suffering we will endure as a result of the gas plant's air pollution. To add 10 million tons of carbon dioxide pollution and a vague estimate of toxic emissions to our active and long-time nonattainment zone would be nothing short of blatant environmental racism. Our metro area is currently 16th worst in the nation for ozone pollution and we have received a failing grade on this air quality standard every single year since 2000. We are already breathing some of the most compromised air in the country. It is unacceptable to invite a new source of hyperscale air pollution into our communities. The carbon dioxide pollution alone will heat our atmosphere at a much faster pace and promote the formation of even more ground-level ozone. Last summer, my 7 year old suffered a grand mal seizure while on the playground at school because the extreme heat led to electrolyte imbalances. My brother works outside everyday without shade or rest breaks and has nowhere to keep his insulin cool. I can barely pay my electricity bills in the summer as it is. We cannot afford more intense heat. The other toxic air pollutants are extremely dangerous–many of them at very low levels. How am I supposed to send my kids to school knowing what they are breathing in? Knowing it can cause permanent brain damage or breathing complications before they have had a chance to grow up. Fuel cells also create hazardous waste and the fuel cell provider for this project has a history of illegally dumping this waste and hiding it for several years. This company will likely repeat its bad habits, illegally dumping dangerous and undisclosed chemicals into our public landfills, and we will just have to wait until somebody notices? Our county has and continues to face an illegal dumping epidemic so how can I be sure that these systemic oversight failures we have locally won't continue and expand to include this dangerous and experimental fuel cell operation. A fine for illegal dumping does not undo damage or its spread once our aquifer and soils are contaminated. It also will not re-capture the volatile chemicals that are released into the air when hazardous waste is improperly stored and disposed of. My family's health and safety should be worth more than the profits of out-of-state corporations. The only defensible options moving forward are to deny this air permit or you must hold a public hearing in-person in Santa Teresa with a component for virtual participation. Materials and the hearing itself must be translated into Spanish and meet any other accessibility needs requested by community members.

No attachments

Comment From: Madeline Simon

7/04/26 @ 4:25 PM

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dum...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Loren Saba

7/04/26 @ 4:25 PM

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. ...↓How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution? A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC. A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance. We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence. Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: Mayela Lopez

7/04/26 @ 4:24 PM

Stop wasting the community's water!!!

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright give...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Kushi Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 4:23 PM

Stop this.

New Mexico Environment Department should give the public an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright g...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Daniela Seda

7/04/26 @ 4:22 PM

This is wrong. Ai doesn't benefit us, what is wrong in your head? You're so far up in privilege you are blinded to how important it is to conserve what little nature we have and preserve water resources. Your future grands kids will not have any wate...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Colton Anthony

7/04/26 @ 4:22 PM

Project Jupiter will be a disaster for the human race. With no water there will be no business to mulct and extort from the working class. It is so bad for the environment.

No attachments

Comment From: Anon Anon

7/04/26 @ 4:22 PM

AI is not something that we need. It's something that we want. We all know we can live without it. And we must because we will die with it. Our planet can't handle all of these data centers polluting our water. Please put an end to this for the sake ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Brice Gould

7/04/26 @ 4:21 PM

STOP PROJECT JUPITER PROTECT OUR PLANET.

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright g...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Melian Kortel

7/04/26 @ 4:19 PM

A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Cadence Petty

7/04/26 @ 4:17 PM

Dear NMED Staff, My name is Cadence. I am a resident of Colorado, living in Colorado Springs. I am writing this to address and bring awareness to my concerns regarding the environmental dangers that Project Jupiter presents to not only residents of N...↓ew Mexico, but also the entirety of the United States as a whole. My intentions of submitting this comment are to urge the New Mexico Environment Department to reject Yucca Growth Infastructure, LLC's air permit application for the YGI Microgrid in Doña Ana County. As I am not a resident of New Mexico, I understand my place of residency may produce skepticism within my stance on Project Jupiter. However, it is critical that I bring to light that the development of Project Jupiter would span harmful effects outside of the state of New Mexico. It poses a great concern to the lives of the American people, as it will make a detrimental impact to the climate and the ecosystem as a whole. The fuel cell powered grid proposed in Project Jupiter has accumulated a variety of evidence and reasoning behind many people's concerns: While the plant's fuel cells do run on hydrogen, which gives the impression of sustainability and protection against damaging the environment, it must interact with hydrogen gas in order to obtain pure hydrogen. When interacting with hydrogen gas, it must separate hydrogen from natural gases, thus emitting greenhouse gases as a byproduct of this process. So, the plant's use of hydrogen fuel cells is not as sustainable as it is presented to be. Considering this, the power plant will produce up to 10 million greenhouse gases emissions into the environment every year. This will have an impact on people even outside of New Mexico, as it further contributes to global warming and its consequential environmental impacts. Furthermore, fuel cells partake in generating hazardous waste. Fuel cells filter out any contaminants found during production into the methane stream, including contaminants like sulfur. As the contaminants are filtered out, they accumulate as hazardous waste. This waste further contributes to the toxic emissions that are produced by the power plant, since the gases from the hazardous waste settle into the ecosystem through plants and then emit into the environment through precipitation. With climate change continuing to be in place within the ecosystem, it will soon be the cause of heat-related illnesses like heat stroke, heart attacks, strokes, and kidney problems; which, can even result in fatal outcomes. It also increases the spread of disease through species such as mosquitoes. As the temperature increases, the areas of where mosquitoes reside geographically will increase and will put people at risk of contracting the diseases spread by these insects. It is evident that these fuel cells make a detrimental impact to the ecosystem, continuing to perpetuate irreversible damage and reverse years of actions that have been made to end climate change. I urge NMED to outright reject YUCCA Yucca Growth Infastructure, LLC's air permit application for the YGI Microgrid. If NMED does not reject the application, I ask that the department holds a bilingual hybrid public hearing near the Santa Teresa community, in order to educate residents on the risks that are presented with fuel cell technology. I also ask that the department holds 60 days of additional time for the public to review and comment on the application to ensure that everyone is able to contribute their input on the matter. Sincerely, Cadence Petty

No attachments

Comment From: Emilia Patiño

7/04/26 @ 4:15 PM

Yucca Growth Infrastructure's gas-powered fuel cell plant is 1,000 times larger than Bloom Energy's biggest existing fuel cell plant. In fact, worldwide, Bloom Energy has developed 1.4 GW of fuel cell technology across more than a thousand locations,...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Aly Park

7/04/26 @ 4:14 PM

I am a resident of Canada and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and se...↓cure future. That future is under threat with this proposed air quality permit. A change to fuel cells has minimal impacts on the suffering we will endure as a result of the gas plant's air pollution. To add 10 million tons of carbon dioxide pollution and a vague estimate of toxic emissions to our active and long-time nonattainment zone would be nothing short of blatant environmental racism. It is unacceptable to invite a new source of hyperscale air pollution into our communities. The carbon dioxide pollution alone will heat our atmosphere at a much faster pace and promote the formation of even more ground-level ozone. We cannot afford more intense heat. The other toxic air pollutants are extremely dangerous–many of them at very low levels. How am I supposed to send my kids to school knowing what they are breathing in? Knowing it can cause permanent brain damage or breathing complications before they have had a chance to grow up. Fuel cells also create hazardous waste and the fuel cell provider for this project has a history of illegally dumping this waste and hiding it for several years.

This company will likely repeat its bad habits, illegally dumping dangerous and undisclosed chemicals into our public landfills, and we will just have to wait until somebody notices? Our county has and continues to face an illegal dumping epidemic so how can I be sure that these systemic oversight failures we have locally won't continue and expand to include this dangerous and experimental fuel cell operation. A fine for illegal dumping does not undo damage or its spread once our aquifer and soils are contaminated. It also will not re-capture the volatile chemicals that are released into the air when hazardous waste is improperly stored and disposed of. My family's health and safety should be worth more than the profits of out-of-state corporations. The only defensible options moving forward are to deny this air permit or you must hold a public hearing in-person in Santa Teresa with a component for virtual participation. Materials and the hearing itself must be translated into Spanish and meet any other accessibility needs requested by community members.

No attachments

Comment From: Miracle Fernandes

7/04/26 @ 4:14 PM

Stop project jupiter! The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Jacob Minella

7/04/26 @ 4:13 PM

This micro grid will raise cancer rates in a highly impoverished area that already has higher than normal cancer rates. Other localities have reported suffocating fumes. I don't believe it's worth it for a center for an unproven technology.

No attachments

Comment From: Clayton Bromley

7/04/26 @ 4:13 PM

We aren't going to have a future if this continues. AI is for money hungry corporations and billionaires and will rob us all of our lives. Having AI now is not beneficial, it's destroying our one and only planet. So what is it, generating an image of...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Brett Neilsen

7/04/26 @ 4:12 PM

Project Jupiter does not belong in New Mexico! New Mexico is still in recovery for being an experiment site in the past. The desert is alive and is a home to many. I do NOT support Project Jupiter.

No attachments

Comment From: Idaly Rivera

7/04/26 @ 4:11 PM

the health of the citizens in the area should be #1 priority. implementing an idea where you have to use so much water where there's an already existing scarcity isn't beneficial to anyone.

No attachments

Comment From: DeMar Lowes

7/04/26 @ 4:09 PM

Stop project jupiter!!
The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Syara De Dios

7/04/26 @ 4:08 PM

I am a resident of Nevada and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and se...↓cure future. That future is under threat with this proposed air quality permit. A change to fuel cells has minimal impacts on the suffering we will endure as a result of the gas plant's air pollution. To add 10 million tons of carbon dioxide pollution and a vague estimate of toxic emissions to our active and long-time nonattainment zone would be nothing short of blatant environmental racism. Our metro area is currently 16th worst in the nation for ozone pollution and we have received a failing grade on this air quality standard every single year since 2000. We are already breathing some of the most compromised air in the country. It is unacceptable to invite a new source of hyperscale air pollution into our communities. The carbon dioxide pollution alone will heat our atmosphere at a much faster pace and promote the formation of even more ground-level ozone. Last summer, my 7 year old suffered a grand mal seizure while on the playground at school because the extreme heat led to electrolyte imbalances. My brother works outside everyday without shade or rest breaks and has nowhere to keep his insulin cool. I can barely pay my electricity bills in the summer as it is. We cannot afford more intense heat. The other toxic air pollutants are extremely dangerous–many of them at very low levels. How am I supposed to send my kids to school knowing what they are breathing in? Knowing it can cause permanent brain damage or breathing complications before they have had a chance to grow up.
Fuel cells also create hazardous waste and the fuel cell provider for this project has a history of illegally dumping this waste and hiding it for several years. This company will likely repeat its bad habits, illegally dumping dangerous and undisclosed chemicals into our public landfills, and we will just have to wait until somebody notices? Our county has and continues to face an illegal dumping epidemic so how can I be sure that these systemic oversight failures we have locally won't continue and expand to include this dangerous and experimental fuel cell operation. A fine for illegal dumping does not undo damage or its spread once our aquifer and soils are contaminated. It also will not re-capture the volatile chemicals that are released into the air when hazardous waste is improperly stored and disposed of. My family's health and safety should be worth more than the profits of out-of-state corporations. The only defensible options moving forward are to deny this air permit or you must hold a public hearing in-person in Santa Teresa with a component for virtual participation. Materials and the hearing itself must be translated into Spanish and meet any other accessibility needs requested by community members.

No attachments

Comment From: Kynleigh Gore

7/04/26 @ 4:07 PM

I am a resident of Arvada and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and se...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Eliza Liz

7/04/26 @ 4:06 PM

We don't need AI or more data centers you soulless scumbags. It's insane that you'd rather jeopardize your and others lives all for an "innovation" that can generate pictured in seconds because your lazy asses can't pick up a pencil. The public shoul...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Julia Hallberg

7/04/26 @ 4:06 PM

I am a resident of Sweden and i ask you to deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. Our planet is enduring massive climate change and this will also disturb the animals and communities around.

New Mexico Environment Department should g...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Jaydin Sanchez

7/04/26 @ 4:06 PM

I am a resident in hobbs nm . If this continues our air will become polluted and we are already suffering in a drought this will take more water. The heat will rise higher with the pollution when we are already experiencing heat of 109 increasing the...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Samiha Farheen

7/04/26 @ 4:05 PM

Don't build any data centers!!! You're ruining the climate, you're going against humanity by doing this.

No attachments

Comment From: Maria Liarra Encina

7/04/26 @ 4:04 PM

we do not need AI! stop this nonsense and build something that restore our green environment instead.

New Mexico Environment Department should give the public an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 4:04 PM

STOP PROJECT JUPITER We DONT need or want a giant data center polluting our already polluted earth!! Global warming is already a big problem, and this will just make it so much worse. This is our ONLY planet that we can live on, no amount of money ca...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 4:04 PM

The project's proposed fuel cell powered grid is concerning for many reasons: It would still produce a high level of greenhouse gas and toxic pollutants This technology generates toxic waste, and the process for handling this waste is still unclear. ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: nathaly contreras

7/04/26 @ 4:03 PM

AI is taking over and it's wasting our water this is unacceptable from AI data centers and someone needs to speak up, once the water is gone everyone is going to be crying about our water source but didn't take action when we had a choice. this has t...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Sara Ben Abdeljelil Jimenez

7/04/26 @ 4:03 PM

My future is under threat with this proposed air quality permit. A change to fuel cells has minimal impacts on the suffering we will endure as a result of the gas plant's air pollution. To add 10 million tons of carbon dioxide pollution and a vague e...↓stimate of toxic emissions to our active and long-time nonattainment zone would be nothing short of blatant environmental racism. Our metro area is currently 16th worst in the nation for ozone pollution and we have received a failing grade on this air quality standard every single year since 2000. We are already breathing some of the most compromised air in the country. It is unacceptable to invite a new source of hyperscale air pollution into our communities. The carbon dioxide pollution alone will heat our atmosphere at a much faster pace and promote the formation of even more ground-level ozone. Last summer, a 7 year old suffered a grand mal seizure while on the playground at school because the extreme heat led to electrolyte imbalances. My brother works outside everyday without shade or rest breaks and has nowhere to keep his insulin cool. I can barely pay my electricity bills in the summer as it is. We cannot afford more intense heat. The other toxic air pollutants are extremely dangerous–many of them at very low levels. How am I supposed to send my kids to school knowing what they are breathing in? Knowing it can cause permanent brain damage or breathing complications before they have had a chance to grow up. Fuel cells also create hazardous waste and the fuel cell provider for this project has a history of illegally dumping this waste and hiding it for several years. This company will likely repeat its bad habits, illegally dumping dangerous and undisclosed chemicals into our public landfills, and we will just have to wait until somebody notices? Our county has and continues to face an illegal dumping epidemic so how can I be sure that these systemic oversight failures we have locally won't continue and expand to include this dangerous and experimental fuel cell operation. A fine for illegal dumping does not undo damage or its spread once our aquifer and soils are contaminated. It also will not re-capture the volatile chemicals that are released into the air when hazardous waste is improperly stored and disposed of. My family's health and safety should be worth more than the profits of out-of-state corporations. The only defensible options moving forward are to deny this air permit or you must hold a public hearing in-person in Santa Teresa with a component for virtual participation. Materials and the hearing itself must be translated into Spanish and meet any other accessibility needs requested by community members.

No attachments

Comment From: Un named -

7/04/26 @ 4:03 PM

I live in Southern Doña Ana County and under no circumstances do I want experimental technology deployed at an unprecedented scale in my backyard. Yucca Growth Infrastructure's gas-powered fuel cell plant is 1,000 times larger than Bloom Energy's big...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Oluwaremi Folami

7/04/26 @ 4:02 PM

I am a resident of RI and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and secure...↓ future. That future is under threat with this proposed air quality permit. A change to fuel cells has minimal impacts on the suffering we will endure as a result of the gas plant's air pollution. To add 10 million tons of carbon dioxide pollution and a vague estimate of toxic emissions to our active and long-time nonattainment zone would be nothing short of blatant environmental racism. Our metro area is currently 16th worst in the nation for ozone pollution and we have received a failing grade on this air quality standard every single year since 2000. We are already breathing some of the most compromised air in the country. It is unacceptable to invite a new source of hyperscale air pollution into our communities. The carbon dioxide pollution alone will heat our atmosphere at a much faster pace and promote the formation of even more ground-level ozone. Last summer, my 7 year old suffered a grand mal seizure while on the playground at school because the extreme heat led to electrolyte imbalances. My brother works outside everyday without shade or rest breaks and has nowhere to keep his insulin cool. I can barely pay my electricity bills in the summer as it is. We cannot afford more intense heat. The other toxic air pollutants are extremely dangerous–many of them at very low levels. How am I supposed to send my kids to school knowing what they are breathing in? Knowing it can cause permanent brain damage or breathing complications before they have had a chance to grow up. Fuel cells also create hazardous waste and the fuel cell provider for this project has a history of illegally dumping this waste and hiding it for several years. This company will likely repeat its bad habits, illegally dumping dangerous andundisclosed chemicals into our public landfills, and we will just have to wait until somebody notices? Our county has and continues to face an illegal dumping epidemic so how can I be sure that these systemic oversight failures we have locally won't continue and expand to include this dangerous and experimental fuel cell operation. A fine for illegal dumping does not undo damage or its spread once our aquifer and soils are contaminated. It also will not re-capture the volatile chemicals that are released into the air when hazardous waste is improperly stored and disposed of. My family's health and safety should be worth more than the profits of out-of-state corporations. The only defensible options moving forward are to deny this air permit or you must hold a public hearing in-person in Santa Teresa with a component for virtual participation. Materials and the hearing itself must be translated into Spanish and meet any other accessibility needs requested by community members.

No attachments

Comment From: Fredrik Skaar

7/04/26 @ 4:02 PM

I am a resident of Norway and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and se...↓cure future. That future is under threat with this proposed air quality permit. A change to fuel cells has minimal impacts on the suffering we will endure as a result of the gas plant's air pollution. To add 10 million tons of carbon dioxide pollution and a vague estimate of toxic emissions to our active and long-time nonattainment zone would be nothing short of blatant environmental racism. Our metro area is currently 16th worst in the nation for ozone pollution and we have received a failing grade on this air quality standard every single year since 2000. We are already breathing some of the most compromised air in the country. It is unacceptable to invite a new source of hyperscale air pollution into our communities. The carbon dioxide pollution alone will heat our atmosphere at a much faster pace and promote the formation of even more ground-level ozone. Last summer, my 7 year old suffered a grand mal seizure while on the playground at school because the extreme heat led to electrolyte imbalances. My brother works outside everyday without shade or rest breaks and has nowhere to keep his insulin cool. I can barely pay my electricity bills in the summer as it is. We cannot afford more intense heat. The other toxic air pollutants are extremely dangerous–many of them at very low levels. How am I supposed to send my kids to school knowing what they are breathing in? Knowing it can cause permanent brain damage or breathing complications before they have had a chance to grow up. Fuel cells also create hazardous waste and the fuel cell provider for this project has a history of illegally dumping this waste and hiding it for several years. This company will likely repeat its bad habits, illegally dumping dangerous and undisclosed chemicals.
New Mexico Environment Department should give the public an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. Approving this permit would be government-sponsored environmental racism directed at residents of Doña Ana County.
If the permit is not denied outright, a public hearing needs to be held in Santa Teresa, in both English and Spanish, with an option to participate virtually.

No attachments

Comment From: Bianca Marino

7/04/26 @ 4:01 PM

I am a resident of El Paso, Texas and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. Even though I live in El Paso, I and all the residents of our beloved city will be affected by this project. I want to stay here in my h...↓ome, and start a family of my own, close to the older generations in my family and my husband's family. If this data center is built, that may no longer be an option for me. How can I raise children without clean water? Without clean air? How can I feed them if I, a taxpayer, am expected to pay for the rising utility costs that it will cause? How am I supposed to send my kids to school knowing what they are breathing in? Knowing it can cause permanent brain damage or breathing complications before they have had a chance to grow up. This project would push me to consider leaving this city for somewhere where our environment and the future of our children is a priority. That future is under threat with this proposed air quality permit. Our metro area is currently 16th worst in the nation for ozone pollution and we have received a failing grade on this air quality standard every single year since 2000. We are already breathing some of the most compromised air in the country. It is unacceptable to invite a new source of hyperscale air pollution into our communities. We are tired of being exploited and lied to, and we will not stand for this abuse. The health and safety of all who live in this region should be worth more than the profits of out-of-state corporations who offer us nothing but destruction in return. The only defensible options moving forward are to deny this air permit or you must hold a public hearing in-person in Santa Teresa with a component for virtual participation. Materials and the hearing itself must be translated into Spanish and meet any other accessibility needs requested by community members.

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. Approving this permit would be government-sponsored environmental racism directed at residents of Doña Ana County.
If the permit is not denied outright, a public hearing needs to be held in Santa Teresa, in both English and Spanish, with an option to participate virtually."

No attachments

Comment From: Alyssa Hall

7/04/26 @ 4:01 PM

Please allow the public an additional 60 days to review and comment about the benefits of Project Jupiter and how it impacts the community. Emphasizing the Air quality/Water quality for the nearby community and for the state overall. The air quality ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Wyatt Adams

7/04/26 @ 4:00 PM

Project Jupiter is a climate disaster. Releasing 10 million fuel cells of carbon dioxide annually. Developers want us to trust that building one of the largest data centers in the world wouldn't threaten the limited water our communities depend on to...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Ariane Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 4:00 PM

We do not want this project. Stop this auto sabotage of our planet.

New Mexico Environment Department should give the public an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 4:00 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Isaac Franklin

7/04/26 @ 3:59 PM

You are actively destroying the world, thats not an attention grabbing opener, it's the open truth. Data centers pokes more holes through our ozone layers than count vlad the impaler poked holes through peasants. Please, please, swallow your greed an...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Amelia Myślińska

7/04/26 @ 3:59 PM

Stop destroying our planet.

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 3:59 PM

https://docs.google.com/document/d/15TRodW04zAAZjRR5r4RuOlegNZD5BHCrAL3nDbDNh7o/edit?usp=drivesdk

No attachments

Comment From: Dalin Stufflebean

7/04/26 @ 3:59 PM

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. ...↓How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution? A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC. A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit.

This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance. We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence. Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance. We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence. Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: Chloe May

7/04/26 @ 3:58 PM

I am a resident of NM and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and secure...↓ future. That future is under threat with this proposed air quality permit. A change to fuel cells has minimal impacts on the suffering we will endure as a result of the gas plant's air pollution. To add 10 million tons of carbon dioxide pollution and a vague estimate of toxic emissions to our active and long-time nonattainment zone would be nothing short of blatant environmental racism. Our metro area is currently 16th worst in the nation for ozone pollution and we have received a failing grade on this air quality standard every single year since 2000. We are already breathing some of the most compromised air in the country. It is unacceptable to invite a new source of hyperscale air pollution into our communities. The carbon dioxide pollution alone will heat our atmosphere at a much faster pace and promote the formation of even more ground-level ozone. Last summer, my 7 year old suffered a grand mal seizure while on the playground at school because the extreme heat led to electrolyte imbalances. My brother works outside everyday without shade or rest breaks and has nowhere to keep his insulin cool. I can barely pay my electricity bills in the summer as it is. We cannot afford more intense heat. The other toxic air pollutants are extremely dangerous–many of them at very low levels. How am I supposed to send my kids to school knowing what they are breathing in? Knowing it can cause permanent brain damage or breathing complications before they have had a chance to grow up. Fuel cells also create hazardous waste and the fuel cell provider for this project has a history of illegally dumping this waste and hiding it for several years. This company will likely repeat its bad habits, illegally dumping dangerous and undi

We are a state that has a multitude of beautiful biomes, flora, fauna, and indigenous and multicultural communities. Our environment and people are already harmed by the production of nuclear energy in Los Alamos. Myself and many of my peers absolutely refuse to accept further misuse of our land by those who view it and its inhabitants as disposable. NO PROJECT JUPITER.

No attachments

Comment From: Peyton Gray

7/04/26 @ 3:57 PM

I live in Fort Mitchell Kentucky, but just because I live so far away does not mean I do not care for the safety of the people of Southern Doña Ana County and under no circumstances do I want experimental technology deployed at an unprecedented scale...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Andrea Lopez

7/04/26 @ 3:57 PM

We keep saying that WE. DO. NOT. WANT. AI. Our environment is already on the verge to collapse, and all we're doing is making plans to speed it up. The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so co...↓

No attachments

Comment From: anonymous anonymous

7/04/26 @ 3:57 PM

I am concerned about the air pollution and the environmental effects of project jupiter. The air quality permit application should be denied given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. government-sponsored environmental racism as...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Judith-Lee Wilson

7/04/26 @ 3:57 PM

I am a resident of New Mexico and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe an...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Nathaniel Escosia

7/04/26 @ 3:57 PM

Fuck project Jupiter. I'm a resident of New Mexico and I want my state to prioritize our health and our environment over some data center.

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 3:57 PM

I hate AI and love the earth. "The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Hannah Bell

7/04/26 @ 3:56 PM

Fuel cells also create hazardous waste and the fuel cell provider for this project has a history of illegally dumping this waste and hiding it for several years. This company will likely repeat its bad habits, illegally dumping dangerous and undisclo...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Margarett Thommas

7/04/26 @ 3:56 PM

Hi. I'm writing this because I care for our future and I hope this project is canceled.

New Mexico Environment Department should give the public an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participa...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Noah Greig

7/04/26 @ 3:56 PM

Please attempt to stop the building of data centers associated with 'project Jupiter'. Please do not forfeit the rights of the people and protection of the natural world for greed and destruction at the hands of those who will be unaffected by the ch...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 3:56 PM

Just because this project is supposedly a 'cleaner' data center doesn't mean a better future for AI data center builds. Dozens of communities have already been impacted by previously built data centers beyond water and air pollution, and more communi...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Kaia Spencer

7/04/26 @ 3:55 PM

Our planet matters more than your profits. Building the largest data centers on Earth isn't progress — it's a reckless gamble with the ecosystems we all depend on. Every megawatt sucked from the grid, every gallon of water boiled for cooling, every a...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Kimberly Kriner

7/04/26 @ 3:55 PM

No! To Project Jupiter air quality permit

No attachments

Comment From: Ariela Oporta González

7/04/26 @ 3:54 PM

No hay un segundo planeta, la tierra es nuestro hogar y deberíamos cuidarla, en lugar de remplazarla

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
T...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 3:54 PM

Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permi...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Kannon Woodrow

7/04/26 @ 3:54 PM

I signed this petition because my own state is having a debate over datacenters and the harm they can bring. Being in close proximity to Garden City, I voted against the construction of a data center earlier this year. The public should be given an a...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anna Anon

7/04/26 @ 3:54 PM

i would like to have water. i literally need it to live. i dont need ai to live.

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Alex Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 3:54 PM

STOP. YOU KNOW DAMN WELL WHAT THIS PROJECT IS FOR!�

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denie...↓

No attachments

Comment From: esma agic

7/04/26 @ 3:53 PM

PROJECT JUPITER SHOULD GET BANNED IT WILL CHANGE OUR CLIMATE RAPIDLY!!!

No attachments

Comment From: Samara Reis

7/04/26 @ 3:53 PM

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. ...↓How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution? A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC. A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance. We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence. Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: Emma Lowe

7/04/26 @ 3:53 PM

This is not good for our planet.

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 3:53 PM

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal du...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Jaylen Quinones

7/04/26 @ 3:53 PM

Project Jupiter is a climate disaster in an already changing climate, the longevity of the human arc is more important than the money that can be made from AI now. The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment. The air qualit...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Gordon Gipson

7/04/26 @ 3:52 PM

Don't build this data center.

No attachments

Comment From: Lin Wolf

7/04/26 @ 3:52 PM

I live in Los Alamos country and I want to advocate for the innocent New Mexican civilians that reside near the proposed Project Jupiter. The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be...↓ inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution? A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC. A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project,99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance. We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence. Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. Approving this permit would be government-sponsored environmental racism directed at residents of Doña Ana County.
If the permit is not denied outright, a public hearing needs to be held in Santa Teresa, in both English and Spanish, with an option to participate virtually."

No attachments

Comment From: Chloe Poncho

7/04/26 @ 3:52 PM

Protecting and caring for our state while no one is speaking up. Caring for the future of our lives were taking action into caring for our future and our HEALTH. Building this project would not only harm us but our environment not making it safe with...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Savannah Bowen

7/04/26 @ 3:51 PM

I am against project Jupiter I want it to be stopped in order to stop losing water, keep the water communities rely on , and make sure the future of citizens lives are economically sound. Without water, The Rio Grande drying up, and the people of pro...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Brianna Amador

7/04/26 @ 3:51 PM

WE DONT WANT THIS

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's hi...↓

No attachments

Comment From: afina santiago

7/04/26 @ 3:51 PM

the data centers and harmful not just to humans but the wildlife ecosystem. dats central take the water resources away from the communities around. The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so co...↓

No attachments

Comment From: E'najha Johnson

7/04/26 @ 3:51 PM

The world is already in a global water crisis, this big of a data center would definitely push us to breaking point.

No attachments

Comment From: G Nex

7/04/26 @ 3:50 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Kourtney Hutchinson

7/04/26 @ 3:50 PM

I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and secure future. That future is un...↓der threat with this proposed air quality permit. A change to fuel cells has minimal impacts on the suffering we will endure as a result of the gas plant's air pollution. To add 10 million tons of carbon dioxide pollution and a vague estimate of toxic emissions to our active and long-time nonattainment zone would be nothing short of blatant environmental racism. Our metro area is currently 16th worst in the nation for ozone pollution and we have received a failing grade on this air quality standard every single year since 2000. We are already breathing some of the most compromised air in the country. It is unacceptable to invite a new source of hyperscale air pollution into our communities. The carbon dioxide pollution alone will heat our atmosphere at a much faster pace and promote the formation of even more ground-level ozone. Last summer, my 7 year old suffered a grand mal seizure while on the playground at school because the extreme heat led to electrolyte imbalances. My brother works outside everyday without shade or rest breaks and has nowhere to keep his insulin cool. I can barely pay my electricity bills in the summer as it is. We cannot afford more intense heat. The other toxic air pollutants are extremely dangerous–many of them at very low levels. How am I supposed to send my kids to school knowing what they are breathing in? Knowing it can cause permanent brain damage or breathing complications before they have had a chance to grow up. Fuel cells also create hazardous waste and the fuel cell provider for this project has a history of illegally dumping this waste and hiding it for several years. This company will likely repeat its bad habits, illegally dumping dangerous and undisclosed chemicals into our public

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. Approving this permit would be government-sponsored environmental racism directed at residents of Doña Ana County.
If the permit is not denied outright, a public hearing needs to be held in Santa Teresa, in both English and Spanish, with an option to participate virtually."

No attachments

Comment From: Nicholas Adkins

7/04/26 @ 3:50 PM

This will destroy rural communities sources to water

No attachments

Comment From: Coral valle

7/04/26 @ 3:50 PM

Do not let project Jupiter pass, it will ruin us. We cannot handle it. Our earth is fucking dying and we have nothing left for our people. I can't even allow myself to spill watar while boiling eggs because I'm scared of our watar supply. "The public...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/04/26 @ 3:50 PM

I am writing because I am concerned about the risks and harms Project Jupiter poses to New Mexicans. I am submitting this comment to urge the New Mexico Environment Department to reject Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC's air permit application for th...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Aniyah Vega

7/04/26 @ 3:49 PM

Our world is growing worse and worse everyday. Building the largest data center of it would just make things worse. We do not need AI.The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community member...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Faith Anon

7/04/26 @ 3:49 PM

I am 17 years old and i have dreams about living in a world where we don't over consume and take land from other life forces for profit. Before we existed the world has been able to take care of itself and move with its own pace. Now that we've evolv...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Mikki Bore

7/04/26 @ 3:49 PM

My name is Mikki. I am a Florida resident, living in Orlando , and I am writing because I am concerned about the risks and harms Project Jupiter poses to New Mexicans and the effects it might have on the whole world. I am submitting this comment to u...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Ace Price

7/04/26 @ 3:49 PM

It is absolutely horrible to hear that a data centre will be built. this plan will one hundred percent destroy our entire worlds ecosystem and pollute not just our water, but also our air and people. Do not built this centre.

"The public should be g...↓

No attachments

Comment From: natalia gonzalez

7/04/26 @ 3:49 PM

i wanna stop the stupid planet jupiter thing and stop using AI. The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably. The air quality permit application should...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Crista Candelaria

7/04/26 @ 3:48 PM

The last thing we need in our beautiful state is a data center. Although it's purpose and funding may seem to be a viable resource for our community, we are not prepared for the consequences. Areas that were once open desert, housing local wildlife, ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Madison Brown

7/04/26 @ 3:48 PM

AI data centers are going to destroy the environment. We already have enough, we dont need more. This project will ruin the planet we live on! We, the people, dont want you to build it!

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Keegan Randel

7/04/26 @ 3:48 PM

We don't need an ai data center. We have as little water here as is, and we don't need a cancerous leech sucking away any more of our already scarce resources. There's nothing good that comes from ai, it gives no one jobs, makes garbage that any dimw...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Blakesley Egan

7/04/26 @ 3:47 PM

This project is dangerious for New Mexico and not sustainable. I hope you decide to reject it.

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Melissa Westbrook

7/04/26 @ 3:47 PM

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit
so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal
dump...↓

No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]