Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC-YGI Microgrid Air Quality Construction Permit Application

Comment From: Kevin van Riisdam

7/05/26 @ 4:15 PM

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dum...↓

No attachments

Comment From: GREY BOYCHUCK

7/05/26 @ 4:15 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Sam Bradley

7/05/26 @ 4:15 PM

This is downright ridiculous. Ai data centers are taking over the world and destroying so many natural resources and polluting the air with emissions and noise. I do not stand with project Jupiter whatsoever and will help with any action aimed toward...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Natalie DeMarco

7/05/26 @ 4:14 PM

We dont want ai and we dont need it to live we need our planet to live and data centers and causing animals to be extinct or disappear isnt helping the planet. Stop forcing our planet to die faster when no one else is agreeing to whats happening and ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: anonymous anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:14 PM

No attachments

Comment From: NATALIE BODELSON

7/05/26 @ 4:14 PM

We do not need large data centers in New Mexico. We are the land of enchantment. I'm not exactly enchanted by all of our water being drained away by something that doesn't need to be here.

No attachments

Comment From: Olivia Wennerstrom

7/05/26 @ 4:14 PM

I want a future with clean air and wildlife! AI DATA CENTERS ARE STEALING WATER FROM HUMANS! The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air qua...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Na NA

7/05/26 @ 4:14 PM

We dont need AI. Its helpful in the MEDICAL FEILD it shouldn'tbe used to talk to an AI BOYFRIEND! we are already losing CLEAN water. People are dying and losing one of the most important things to live WATER. Project Jupiter just proves people are ac...↓

No attachments

Comment From: anonymous anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:14 PM

As a New Mexico resident, I urge the NMED to reject this permit in order to protect the health and environment of my fellow New Mexicans. It is well-known that Bloom Energy has a history of illegal dumping of hazardous waste. On to of that, they have...↓ not provided good faith estimates of the true environmental impact of the project, which will be devastating. Furthermore, it is obvious that the NMED will not have any practicable way of monitoring and enforcing any pollution limits on this disaster of a plant. See below.

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution?

A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC.

A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance.

We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence.

Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: JACQUIE CHILTON

7/05/26 @ 4:13 PM

This project is a climate disaster and we should we making decisions to help reduce and improve our climate impact not make it worse. Furthermore, these data centres negatively affect the water of surrounding towns and communities making it unsafe an...↓

No attachments

Comment From: SJA Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:13 PM

NO PROJECT JUPITER, NO DATA CENTERS IN NM.

New Mexico Environment Department should give the public an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit applica...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Alexa Gabriel

7/05/26 @ 4:13 PM

STOP THE JUPITER PROJECT. OUR EARTH IS DYING, NOT ONLY ARE WE DOING NOTHING ABOUT IT, WERE MAKING IT WORSE. STOP AND TAKE ACTION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE.

No attachments

Comment From: anonymous anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:13 PM

We do not need AI centers. We only get one Earth and we should let it thrive! The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit app...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Paulo Rivera

7/05/26 @ 4:12 PM

As a resident who contributes creatively to my community. I am gravely concerned about the environmental impact this so called Project Jupiter will have in our natural area. First off, the people were never informed of this agreement which was made b...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Sasha Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:12 PM

I live in Southern Doña Ana County and under no circumstances do I want experimental technology deployed at an unprecedented scale in my backyard. Yucca Growth Infrastructure's gas-powered fuel cell plant is 1,000 times larger than Bloom Energy's big...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Tania Parra

7/05/26 @ 4:12 PM

I care about my community and the air quality of New Mexico we are in drought not just us but 11 other states climate change need to change for the better not for worse

No attachments

Comment From: Sofia Torres

7/05/26 @ 4:12 PM

If the air changes then it gets really hot once it gets really hot then the humidity goes up it's going to be feel like a hundred degrees and people can have seizure so more people are going to be hurt. The public should be given an additional 60 day...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Alexsandra Rivera

7/05/26 @ 4:12 PM

I am a resident of ABQ and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and secur...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Nailah Allen

7/05/26 @ 4:12 PM

Project Jupiter needs to be stopped.

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Layla Evans

7/05/26 @ 4:11 PM

I am Layla, I am not from America but the pain this issue brings the world globally is immense. The earth we live on does nothing but provide for us, yet we are the only things that choose to and continue to destroy the earth. I feel, as the new gene...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Julianna Garza

7/05/26 @ 4:11 PM

I am a resident of San Antonio, Texas, and I beg you to have an ounce of humanity and realize that we are all living through the big corporations tearing apart nature when we could all use these resources to help each other live a healthier, happier ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Summer Alverio

7/05/26 @ 4:11 PM

STOP PROJECT JUPITER. we barely have enough water as it is. Whoever is for it is mindless and retarted. The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably. ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: leonora Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:10 PM

leave nature alone�

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on ...↓any of these stacks. How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution?

A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC.

A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance.

We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence.

Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. Approving this permit would be government-sponsored environmental racism directed at residents of Doña Ana County.
If the permit is not denied outright, a public hearing needs to be held in Santa Teresa, in both English and Spanish, with an option to participate virtually."

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:10 PM

Don't do it.

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Emmanuelle Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:10 PM

Je suis une adolescente qui a grandi dans une société déjà condamné au réchauffement climatique et je pense avec aucun doute qu'il est réellement temps de prendre action et de changer avant qu'il ne soit trop tard et l'une des choses les plus importa...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Rose perez

7/05/26 @ 4:10 PM

We don't need AI to survive. We need water that's already scarce. SAY NO TO PROJECT JUPITER.

No attachments

Comment From: Steven Rodriguez Peña

7/05/26 @ 4:10 PM

No attachments

Comment From: BRAYDON HAWKINS

7/05/26 @ 4:10 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:09 PM

This is not necessary at all. what happned to the peoples government and country?? PEOPLE DONT WANT THIS!!! Americans drinking water is being stolen for something they don't want or support. STOP THIS!!project jupiter will destroy peoples lives. clea...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Moira Lucardie

7/05/26 @ 4:09 PM

This project is a climate disaster.

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Abby King

7/05/26 @ 4:09 PM

Dear NMED staff,
My name is Abby King. I live in East Windsor Cat, and I am writing because I am concerned about the risks and harms Project Jupiter poses to New Mexicans. I am submitting this comment to urge the New Mexico Environment Department t...↓

No attachments

Comment From: anonymous anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:09 PM

KINSHIP. The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these...↓ stacks. How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution?

A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC.

A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance.

We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence.

Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: Alessandra Martinez

7/05/26 @ 4:08 PM

Im taking action to try and stop this project, it will limit our water supply and IS a climate disaster.

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors a...↓nd controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution?

A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC.

A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance.

We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence.

Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: Zowie Gama

7/05/26 @ 4:08 PM

I live in Doña Ana County and under no circumstances do I want experimental technology deployed at an unprecedented scale in my backyard. Yucca Growth Infrastructure's gas-powered fuel cell plant is 1,000 times larger than Bloom Energy's biggest exis...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Tommy Lewis

7/05/26 @ 4:08 PM

Stop project jupiter! The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on...↓ any of these stacks. How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution?

A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC.

A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance.

We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence.

Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: Steven Rodriguez Peña

7/05/26 @ 4:07 PM

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal du...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Audrey Mattoon, PhD

7/05/26 @ 4:07 PM

"New Mexico can not afford to waste the water that we need for life on development designed exclusively to extract from this state. New Mexico has - since long before America was founded - been home to complex urban societies able to survive in our h...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:07 PM

I am not in support of project Jupiter, it is going to destroy ecosystems, take away resources we need, and it's going to contribute to the already large amount of pollution that we have. Project Jupiter is a problem and it is going to be the reason ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:07 PM

NO PROJECT JUPITER, NO DATA CENTERS IN NM

New Mexico Environment Department should give the public an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit applicat...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anika Takittc

7/05/26 @ 4:07 PM

Project Jupiter would be disastrous for our climate and could drain the fresh water supply. Large AI data centers can use up to 5 million gallons of fresh water a day, and considering that Project Jupiter is proposed to be one of the largest data cen...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:07 PM

Dear NMED staff,

I am writing because I am concerned about the risks and harms Project Jupiter poses to New Mexicans. I am submitting this comment to urge the New Mexico Environment Department to reject Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC's air perm...↓

No attachments

Comment From: anonymous anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:06 PM

we need to stop project jupiter, the politicians clearly do not see it yet, but it will destroy our environment and cause big harm to the area close to the data center. it will make it harder for us to reverse the global environmental damage which wi...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Abigail Tooley

7/05/26 @ 4:06 PM

A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:06 PM

Dear NMED staff,
I live in Lagos, and I am writing because I am concerned
about the risks and harms Project Jupiter poses to New Mexicans. I am submitting this comment
to urge the New Mexico Environment Department to reject Yucca Growth Infrastru...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Bade Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:06 PM

Stop projecting jupiter

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution control...↓s on any of these stacks. How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution?

A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC.

A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance.

We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence.

Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. Approving this permit would be government-sponsored environmental racism directed at residents of Doña Ana County.
If the permit is not denied outright, a public hearing needs to be held in Santa Teresa, in both English and Spanish, with an option to participate virtually."

No attachments

Comment From: Iliana Camarena

7/05/26 @ 4:05 PM

AI should never be considered more valuable than human lives.

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Aleighya Zak

7/05/26 @ 4:05 PM

Protect our planet.

New Mexico Environment Department should give the public an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied o...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Michael Mariscal

7/05/26 @ 4:05 PM

Stop the data center save the planet

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright give...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:05 PM

we can live without AI. we cannot live without water.

No attachments

Comment From: Haylie Paquin

7/05/26 @ 4:05 PM

I am currently a resident in Colorado but my whole life i grew up in New Mexico. It pains me to see what AI has done to this world. I believe Project Jupiter is an unnecessary project and will bring more destruction to the environment and to the futu...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Mariela n/a

7/05/26 @ 4:05 PM

We need our resources. New Mexico doesn't have a lot of resources if we do continue with this project Jupiter we're gonna end up with less resources. We already are dealing with something like this in New Mexico and then to have a second one build ne...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Melia Coreea

7/05/26 @ 4:04 PM

Fuel cells also create hazardous waste and the fuel cell provider for this project has a history of illegally dumping this waste and hiding it for several years. This company will likely repeat its bad habits, illegally dumping dangerous and undisclo...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Roaa Mohammed

7/05/26 @ 4:04 PM

please stop it, the world is dying because of AI and you want to destroy it faster, the earth is getting killed by the climate changes, we want to keep our clean water for us not AI i want the air, the trees, the bugs, the animals, and the water, the...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:04 PM

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably. Several incredibly harmful chemicals would be released into the air here. The data center would also be c...↓

No attachments

Comment From: hadia omari

7/05/26 @ 4:04 PM

Dear NMED staff, My name is hadia I am a texan resident, living in kyle and I am writing because I am concerned about the risks and harms Project Jupiter poses to New Mexicans and everyone else . I am submitting this comment to urge the New Mexico En...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Edana Otero

7/05/26 @ 4:04 PM

Changing the proposal doesn't change the risk. We do not want data centers. We want clean water and clean air. We need to protect our land and our people, not make the rich, richer. Stop Project Jupiter and keep data centers out. Protect our land, ou...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Caleb Cooper

7/05/26 @ 4:03 PM

As a Christian, I do not approve of the native environment and already fragile communities of New Mexico to be further endangered and exploited by companies who do not have our best interests in mind, who only care about lining their pockets, and who...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Natalie Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:02 PM

My name is Natalie, and I am against the Yucca Growth infrastructure. I want to live in a safe, clean environment where I don't have to worry about clean air and pollution. What they're doing should not be tolerated, they're hurting our planet and de...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Alex Mahar

7/05/26 @ 4:02 PM

stop this!!

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history o...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Kaylie Khap

7/05/26 @ 4:02 PM

I am a resident of Fayetteville, NC asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit.I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and se...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Sofia Kronholm

7/05/26 @ 4:02 PM

Save the world from artificial intelligence

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO propose...↓d pollution controls on any of these stacks. How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution?

A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC.

A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance.

We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence.

Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

"The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. Approving this permit would be government-sponsored environmental racism directed at residents of Doña Ana County.
If the permit is not denied outright, a public hearing needs to be held in Santa Teresa, in both English and Spanish, with an option to participate virtually."

No attachments

Comment From: anonymous anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:01 PM

The New Mexico Environment Department's mission statement is "to protect and restore the environment and to foster a healthy and prosperous NM for present and future generations." Project Jupiter flies in the face of this mission. Stop Project Jupite...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Ayannia Anchondo

7/05/26 @ 4:01 PM

Stop Project Jupiter!

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's...↓

No attachments

Comment From: anonymous anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:01 PM

We do not need anymore data centers. It's honestly cute how the rich assume we're going to stay quiet while they destroy the world. No. We do not want AI. We do not want thousand degrees summers, we want water. We want four seasons. I do not want to ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Rosabella Woodruff Woodruff

7/05/26 @ 4:01 PM

I am someone who lives with people in the electronic business, and one of the greatest pains in my life would be all of his hard work going to waste because of something that we don't particularly need. I think data centers are for people who are laz...↓

No attachments

Comment From: La Reina anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:00 PM

Stop Project Jupiter! The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably. The air quality permit application should be denied given Bloom Energy's history of...↓

No attachments

Comment From: anonymous anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:00 PM

This will harm the environment even more, and having people suffer just for data centers is cruel. The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The a...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Milo Mitchell

7/05/26 @ 4:00 PM

I am strongly against this data center being built. Is money really worth the impact? Can you eat money?

New Mexico Environment Department should give the public an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community memb...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 4:00 PM

I am submitting this comment to urge the New Mexico Environment Department to reject Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC's air permit application for the YGI Microgrid in Doña Ana County. toxic waste is a concern as fuel cells generate hazardous waste. ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Calvin rush

7/05/26 @ 4:00 PM

I live in cincinnati and under no circumstances do I want experimental technology deployed at an unprecedented scale in my backyard. Yucca Growth Infrastructure's gas-powered fuel cell plant is 1,000 times larger than Bloom Energy's biggest existing ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Brynn Guillot

7/05/26 @ 4:00 PM

I am a young person aware of ai and its impacts, and from what i know, ai will destroy my future, and many other young people's futures. entry level jobs are taken by ai, lowering the chances for people to get into the workforce and gain experience. ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Maham Rahman

7/05/26 @ 3:59 PM

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. ...↓How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution? A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC. A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance.

We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence.

Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: Kiersten Williford

7/05/26 @ 3:58 PM

We can live without data centers but we can't live without water or the nature that it's destroying. The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Tania Parra

7/05/26 @ 3:58 PM

I care about my community and the air quality of New Mexico we are in drought not just us but 11 other states climate change need to change for the better not for worse.

No attachments

Comment From: Arlia Wilcox

7/05/26 @ 3:57 PM

Stop project jupiter before its too late. Save not just youself but all of us!

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit a...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Rose Perez

7/05/26 @ 3:57 PM

We don't need AI to survive. We need water that's already scarce. SAY NO TO PROJECT JUPITER.

No attachments

Comment From: coolest person you've ever met

7/05/26 @ 3:57 PM

i don't want the earth to explode early, i want a future, i want everyone to have a better future. and i believe everyone too, wants to have a better future, for themselves, for their children, for their future children. The proposed design has an in...↓dividual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution?

A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC.

A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance.

We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence.

No attachments

Comment From: Hinepukohurangi Tiuka Grant

7/05/26 @ 3:57 PM

Dear NMED staff, my name is Hinepukohurangi, although I live overseas, I can still see and understand the risks to living and health this would cause the residents of New Mexico if Project Jupiter is to go through. Aswell as risks to animals and the ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Justin Lambert

7/05/26 @ 3:56 PM

No to Project Jupiter! This community is struggling enough. I am deeply concerned regarding the emissions of this data center.

No attachments

Comment From: anonymous anonymous

7/05/26 @ 3:56 PM

project jupiter will destroy peoples lives. clean water is a BASIC RIGHT!! This is not necessary at all. what happened to the peoples government and country?? PEOPLE DONT WANT THIS!!! Americans drinking water is being stolen for something they don't ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Raven McDonald

7/05/26 @ 3:55 PM

Stop ai.

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Haylie Paquin

7/05/26 @ 3:54 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Rebecca Kightlinger

7/05/26 @ 3:54 PM

Dear NMED staff, My name is Rebecca Kightlinger. I am writing because I am concerned about the risks and harms Project Jupiter poses to New Mexicans. Project Jupiter poses serious and irreversible harm to our planet. Project Jupiter's power plant wil...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Annabel Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 3:54 PM

Don't ruin the environment for AI. Don't let project Jupiter happen.

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Tiana La

7/05/26 @ 3:53 PM

I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit due to the predicted health impacts of air pollution and hazardous waste.

My asks:
- The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air qua...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Amber Moore

7/05/26 @ 3:53 PM

I am submitting this comment to urge the New Mexico Environment Department to reject Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC's air permit application for the YGI Microgrid in Doña Ana County. The project's proposed fuel cell powered grid is concerning for m...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Ava Penz-Gaudet

7/05/26 @ 3:52 PM

Data centers are known to add to the climate crisis, if we want a fighting chance to save our world and help future generations then we have to stop project jupiter immediately. Otherwise the current generation of children will suffer as adults due t...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Liv gogol

7/05/26 @ 3:52 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Ryleah Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 3:52 PM

No we do not want that even in different countries, states and communities.

This is not good for our world.

No attachments

Comment From: George Dipaolo

7/05/26 @ 3:52 PM

continuing the growth of data that only benefits the company behind these centers, and constantly affirming your users into thinking a prompt box cares. this technology only further damages our already fragile earth that is full of sprawl and greed. ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Isabella Marchione

7/05/26 @ 3:52 PM

People are going to die from what will happen if this goes through. It will create irreversible damage and ruin the lives of millions and spread amongst the people, ending up ruining the lives of everyone on our planet due to their greedy and selfish...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anika Tackitt

7/05/26 @ 3:52 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Aishling Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 3:51 PM

Dear NMED staff,
I am writing because I am concerned about the risks and harms Project Jupiter poses to New Mexicans. I am submitting this comment to urge the New Mexico Environment Department to reject Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC's air permit...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Ben Bilger

7/05/26 @ 3:51 PM

save the environment fuck project jupiter

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Kadi Sweidan

7/05/26 @ 3:51 PM

Yucca Growth Infrastructure's gas-powered fuel cell plant is 1,000 times larger than Bloom Energy's biggest existing fuel cell plant. In fact, worldwide, Bloom Energy has developed 1.4 GW of fuel cell technology across more than a thousand locations,...↓ yet Yucca Growth Infrastructure is asking for nearly double that (2.46 GW of fuel cells) at a singular location. The largest fuel cell plant in the entire world is more than 30 times smaller than the fuel cell plant under consideration in Santa Teresa. There is absolutely no way to know, with certainty, what the actual pollution levels will be given the tremendous size differential, and thus gap in data, between operational fuel cell plants and this theoretical plant proposed by Yucca Growth Infrastructure. Betting the livability of our county on this unpredictable and unproven plan would be a total capitulation and betrayal of your so-called values: "protects the public health of New Mexicans...by preventing the deterioration of air quality;" "protect and restore the environment...foster a healthy NM for present and future generations"

Though approximations of annual air pollution were provided, the testing used an extremely weak methodology leaving us, ultimately, with pseudoscientific guesses that have large margins of error. Estimated pollution levels for this gas-powered fuel cell plant are based on only three 4-hour pollution tests from a very small unit (only 65 kW). This is a far cry from thousands of sweltering fuel cells operating 24/7 at maximum output in close proximity, all in the scorching heat of our open desert. The lack of rigorous testing at even this small of a scale is lazy and very concerning, especially given that the gas power plant Yucca Growth Infrastructure wants to build is 37,000 times bigger than this unit.

A 15% "safety margin" was added to the numbers provided by the applicant. Safety margins are not usually added if a company is confident in the accuracy of their pollution estimates. "Even small variations from this superficial test will result in massively different levels of pollution and given that the plant will be 37,000 bigger than the testing unit, a 15% safety margin is completely insufficient–it could work as a margin for a single unit, but not the entire plant. If a unit has a 0.01% chance of failing (sounds promising right?), the odds of 37,000 of those units working perfectly at the same time is 2.47% (pathetically low feasibility). That means there is a 97.53% chance that the plant will experience at least one failure. What will the exact level of redundancy be? Will more fuel cells be rubberstamped or pollution levels overlooked in five years or less due to age-related inefficiencies?

What about cases of catastrophic failure? Are we approving those deadly incidents of pollution in advance without any real data informing us of the risks at this scale? Highly flammable hydrogen under high pressure only needs a microscopic crack to leak out, ignite, explode, and level entire neighborhoods and schools while sending shockwaves into nearby counties. Assuming this risk, an act of gross negligence, at a scale that has never even remotely been demonstrated in practice would be unbelievably careless. These permits must be denied outright. If further deliberation is desired, a public hearing in Santa Teresa is non-negotiable.

No attachments

Comment From: NA NA

7/05/26 @ 3:50 PM

No attachments

Comment From: anonymous anonymous

7/05/26 @ 3:49 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Gabriela na

7/05/26 @ 3:49 PM

Do you not worry about your own future? Your children's future? Each generation we wish nothing for the best for the next, creating a better world for them. Allowing the air permit would deny a joyous future. There is another way of doing this withou...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Sofia Arcia

7/05/26 @ 3:49 PM

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. ...↓How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution? A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC. A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit.

This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance. We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the statistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence. Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied outright given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazardous waste. Approving this permit would be government-sponsored environmental racism directed at residents of Doña Ana County.
If the permit is not denied outright, a public hearing needs to be held in Santa Teresa, in both English and Spanish, with an option to participate virtually.

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/05/26 @ 3:49 PM

stop the project please!!

New Mexico Environment Department should give the public an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be de...↓

No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]