Review of Issuance of Permit No. DP-1132

22 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Bill Tiwald

5/09/23 @ 10:19 AM
Dear Members of the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission:

Now is time for the WQCC to determine it does not have jurisdiction over the hazardous waste operations in the Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility (RLWTF). The NM Water Quality ...

   The Water Quality Act does not apply to any activity or condition subject to the authority of the environmental improvement board pursuant to the Hazardous Waste Act [Chapter 74, Article 4 NMSA 1978], the Ground Water Protection Act [Chapter 74, Article 6B NMSA 1978] or the Solid Waste Act except to abate water pollution or to control the disposal or use of septage and sludge. [Emphasis added.]   

Stop the BS! The WQCC must recognize it does not have authority under the NM Water Quality Act to regulate the RLWTF, a hazardous waste facility. The WQCC must deny the discharge permit, DP-1132. NMED must do its job and fully regulate the RLWTF under the NM Hazardous Waste Act.
No attachments

Comment From: Christina Farmer

5/09/23 @ 8:01 AM
To Members of the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission:


I strongly disagree with the Hearing Officer's recommendation to the NM Water Quality Control Commission (WQCC) to deny standing to CCNS and HOPE. These organizations have members who are ...


The NM Water Quality Act specifically states that it does not apply to facilities that handle, treat and store hazardous waste, which are required to be regulated by the NM Hazardous Waste Act.


Only the Hazardous Waste Act and its regulations can properly safeguard our community from hazardous wastes in the RLWTF. To say that the CCNS members lack standing to ask for such regulation ignores the reality of the dangers that the RLWTF presents to the community.


The WQCC must recognize it does not have any authority under the NM Water Quality Act to regulate the RLWTF, a hazardous waste facility. The WQCC must deny the discharge permit, DP-1132. The NMED must do its job and fully regulate the RLWTF under the NM Hazardous Waste Act.



Christina Farmer
No attachments

Comment From: Eric Benavidez

5/08/23 @ 7:54 PM
​To Members of the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission:

I strongly disagree with the Hearing Officer's recommendation to the NM Water Quality Control Commission (WQCC) to deny standing to CCNS and HOPE. These organizations have members who ar...

The NM Water Quality Act specifically states that it does not apply to facilities that handle, treat and store hazardous waste, which are required to be regulated by the NM Hazardous Waste Act.

Only the Hazardous Waste Act and its regulations can properly safeguard our community from hazardous wastes in the RLWTF. To say that the CCNS members lack standing to ask for such regulation ignores the reality of the dangers that the RLWTF presents to the community.

The WQCC must recognize it does not have any authority under the NM Water Quality Act to regulate the RLWTF, a hazardous waste facility. The WQCC must deny the discharge permit, DP-1132. The NMED must do its job and fully regulate the RLWTF under the NM Hazardous Waste Act.
No attachments

Comment From: Laura Watchempino

5/08/23 @ 4:18 PM
Members of the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission:

On October 13, 1994, CCNS first raised concerns about the seepage through tank walls within the Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility (RLWTF) at LANL. See the Administrative Record 000...

The NM Water Quality Act clearly states that:

B. The Water Quality Act does not apply to any activity or condition subject to the authority of the environmental improvement board pursuant to the Hazardous Waste Act [Chapter 74, Article 4 NMSA 1978], the Ground Water Protection Act [Chapter 74, Article 6B NMSA 1978] or the Solid Waste Act except to abate water pollution or to control the disposal or use of septage and sludge. [Emphasis added.] 74-6-12 NMSA

The dangerous hazardous materials stored in tanks at the RLWTF are clearly subject to regulation under the Hazardous Waste Act by the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED).

Further, I strongly disagree with the Hearing Officer's recommendation to the NM Water Quality Control Commission (WQCC) to deny standing to Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety (CCNS) and Honor Our Pueblo Existence (HOPE). These organizations have members who are affected, both in the past and presently, by releases of hazardous materials that are treated and stored in the Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility (RLWTF) at Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Only the Hazardous Waste Act and its regulations can properly safeguard downstream communities from the imminent danger to public health posed by hazardous waste leaks from the RLWTF into the domestic water supply sources that flow through their communities, but the New Mexico Environment Department has failed to assert its jurisdiction to regulate these materials under the Hazardous Waste Act.

CCNS members are therefore compelled to request that the Water Quality Control Commission vacate the issuance of discharge permit, DP-1132 and deny any future renewals of the discharge permit, so that the NMED can exercise its lawful authority to regulate the RLWTF under the NM Hazardous Waste Act.
No attachments

Comment From: Sebastiaan Stokhof de Jong

5/08/23 @ 12:54 PM
1.​To Members of the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission:

On October 13, 1994, CCNS first raised concerns about the seepage through tank walls within the Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility (RLWTF) at LANL. See the Administrative Reco...

Please review the NM Water Quality Act limitation that states at 74-6-12 NMSA:

B. The Water Quality Act does not apply to any activity or condition subject to the authority of the environmental improvement board pursuant to the Hazardous Waste Act [Chapter 74, Article 4 NMSA 1978], the Ground Water Protection Act [Chapter 74, Article 6B NMSA 1978] or the Solid Waste Act except to abate water pollution or to control the disposal or use of septage and sludge. [Emphasis added.]

The Hazardous Waste Act is the appropriate law to regulate dangerous hazardous materials that are handled, treated and stored within the RLWTF, but it is not being used by the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED).

The WQCC must recognize it does not have the authority under the NM Water Quality Act to regulate the RLWTF, a hazardous waste facility. The WQCC must vacate the issuance of discharge permit, DP-1132. The NMED must do its job and fully regulate the RLWTF under the NM Hazardous Waste Act.
No attachments

Comment From: John Wilks

5/08/23 @ 12:27 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Gregory Corning

5/04/23 @ 12:33 PM
I hope that you, the reader, are in good health and a good frame of mind these days.

The Hazardous Waste Act is the correct law by which to regulate the Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility (RLWTF). The New Mexico Water Quality Act quite clearl...
The New Mexico Environment Department - and no one else - must regulate the RLWTF under the NM Hazardous Waste Act.
By the way, the organizations Honor Our Pueblo Existence and Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety must be recognized as having standing in this matter. They are speaking for us citizens, who, after all, every government agency and body works for.
Thank you.
Gregory Corning
No attachments

Comment From: Cynthia McNamara

4/29/23 @ 4:44 PM
I strongly disagree with the Hearing Officer's recommendation to the NM Water Quality Control Commission (WQCC) to deny standing to CCNS and HOPE in the matter of permitting of the Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility (RLWTF) at Los Alamos Nat...

Further, I share the concerns first expressed by years ago by CCNS and HOPE about the seepage through tank walls within the RLWTF at LANL. (See the Administrative Record 00003 – 00006.) Recent reports indicate continuing hazardous seepage through tank walls. The seepages include hazardous caustic and acid liquid wastes, which are required to be regulated by the NM Hazardous Waste Act, not the NM Water Quality Act.

Please review the NM Water Quality Act limitation, 74-6-12 NMSA:

B. The Water Quality Act does not apply to any activity or condition subject to the authority of the environmental improvement board pursuant to the Hazardous Waste Act [Chapter 74, Article 4 NMSA 1978], the Ground Water Protection Act [Chapter 74, Article 6B NMSA 1978] or the Solid Waste Act except to abate water pollution or to control the disposal or use of septage and sludge.

The Hazardous Waste Act, not the NM Water Quality Act, is the appropriate law to regulate dangerous hazardous materials that are handled, treated, and stored within the RLWTF, but it is not being used by the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED). Only the Hazardous Waste Act and its regulations can properly safeguard our community from hazardous wastes in the RLWTF. To say that the CCNS members lack standing to ask for such regulation ignores the reality of the dangers that the RLWTF presents to the community, which extends far beyond the physical confines of LANL.

The people of New Mexico are ill-served by the permitting authority over RLWTF continuing to reside with the NM Water Quality Control Commission, an arrangement that has resulted in the planning and partial construction of two new Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facilities, located next door to the old treatment facility and reportedly destined to process liquid radioactive and hazardous wastes from the fabrication of plutonium pits. Under the governance of the NM Water Quality Act, these additional structures required no notification to the public and no hearings at which the public could express opinions, present evidence, question witnesses, and make arguments in support of or opposition to the additional facilities. The lack of transparency is deeply troubling.

The WQCC must recognize it does not have any authority under the NM Water Quality Act to regulate the RLWTF, a hazardous waste facility. The WQCC must deny the discharge permit, DP-1132. If the WQCC is incapable of governing itself and acknowledging the Hazardous Waste Act, a higher authority should intervene. The NMED must step up and do its job and fully regulate the RLWTF under the NM Hazardous Waste Act.

Thank you for considering my comments.
No attachments

Comment From: April Mondragon

4/10/23 @ 10:20 PM
To Members of the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission:

CCNS and HOPE are 2 of my local experts on LANL toxic waste issues and how it effects me, my family, and NM communities. I strongly disagree with the Hearing Officer's recommendation to th...
No attachments

Comment From: Elliott Skinner

4/10/23 @ 10:18 PM
I am asking the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission to review the ground water discharge permit. I do not want
the request for review of CCNS and Hope to be dismissed. # DP-1132 Elliott Skinner I live in Santa Fe, NM 505 983 3906
No attachments

Comment From: Linda Hibbs

4/10/23 @ 10:15 PM
I am asking the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission to review the ground water discharge permit. I do not want
the request for review of CCNS and Hope to be dismissed. # DP-1132 Linda Hibbs lhibbs@cybermesa.com I live in Santa Fe, NM 505...
No attachments

Comment From: Luna Olavarria Gallegos

4/10/23 @ 8:59 PM
I rely on HOPE and CNS to provide information and opportunities to challenge the issuance of DP -1132. I support standing for CCNS and HOPE in the DP 1132 petition for review before the NM Water Quality Control Comission.
No attachments

Comment From: Deborah Reade

4/10/23 @ 5:57 PM
I was shocked to find out that the Hearing Officer recommended to the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission that CCNS and HOPE be denied standing. How is this possible when the two groups and their members are already directly affected by conta...

I rely on both these groups, and especially on CCNS of which I am a member, and on J. Gilbert Sanchez, Kathy Wanpovi Sanchez and Joni Arends to keep me informed about the Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility and about action opportunities for me to challenge DP-1132.

This facility has had multiple botched and corrupt hearings where the Hearing Officer and the Chair of the WQCC were trying to get jobs with the DOE while they were ruling in favor of the DOE. I consider the discharge permit for this facility to be a "phony permit" because this facility should be regulated under RCRA as it doesn't have any discharge except when DOE is trying to prove that they should have a discharge permit.

You must end this corruption and the disrespect for the public, including the disrespect for CCNS, HOPE and the individuals named above caused by their standing to be questioned. You are also disrespecting me and other members of the public who could be affected by this facility when you deny standing to our representatives. Please do the right thing and recognize that these groups and individuals deserve standing so that they can help make sure the facility is regulated in the proper way, not with some phony "compromise" permit.
No attachments

Comment From: Daniel Romero

4/10/23 @ 2:57 PM
Daniel Romero


I write today to share my feelings of disappointment and disgust that the NM WQCC held a hearing during which the hearing officer recommended that CCNS and Honor Our Pueblo Existence (HOPE) should not have a legal standing in DP-1132. Mo...


My bloodline runs thick in Northern New Mexico and I have many friends and family members living and surviving here. Our water is our life. It is both unethical and inhumane to attempt to undermine the lives of my people. Stay true to your word and agreement and work with CCNS and HOPE to create a more stable and healthy future for the people of Northern New Mexico.


I Daniel Romero support standing for CCNS and HOPE in the DP-1132 petition for review before the New Mexico Water Quality Commission. I rely on CCNS and HOPE to provide information and opportunities to take action and challenge the issuance of DP-1132 before the NM Environment Department and NM Water Quality Control Commission.


Revoking their standing goes against federal precedence and doing what is RIGHT for all cases of this nature.
No attachments

Comment From: Kelly Pasholk

4/10/23 @ 2:53 PM
To Members of the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission:

I stand with CCNS and HOPE in the DP-1132 petition for review before the NM Water Quality Control Commission.

I ask you to be accountable in your position as a Water Quality Control Commiss...

I rely on CCNS and HOPE to provide information and opportunities to take action to challenge the issuance of DP-1132 before the NM Environment Department and the NM Water Quality Control Commission.
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Noel

4/10/23 @ 1:42 PM
I am a retiree of Los Alamos National Laboratory. I know from experience that the scientists at the Lab do not always have all the information they pretend to have. "Dazzle them with BS" was one of the sayings the scientists used when they didn't act...
No attachments

Comment From: Maia Duerr

4/10/23 @ 1:09 PM
To Members of the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission:

I am writing because I disagree with the Hearing Officer's recommendation to the NMWQCC denying standing to Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety and Honor Our Pueblo Existence. Of all th...
No attachments

Comment From: Abigail Blueher

4/10/23 @ 11:33 AM
I am writing as a community member who is in support of CCNS and HOPE in the DP-1132 petition for review before the NM Water Quality Control Commission. I rely on CCNS and HOPE to provide information and opportunities to take action to challenge the ...
No attachments

Comment From: Thomas Depree

4/10/23 @ 10:46 AM
Members of the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission:

I stand in support for CCNS and HOPE in the DP-1132 petition for review before the NM Water Quality Control Commission. I strongly disagree with the Hearing Officer's recommendation to the NM...
No attachments

Comment From: Myrriah Gómez

4/10/23 @ 9:56 AM
As someone who grew up in the Pojoaque Valley with the vast majority of my family still living in the Pojoaque Valley and as an advisory board member of Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety, I am angered that during Holy Week in New Mexico, when peo...

I support standing for CCNS and HOPE in the DP-1132 petition for review before the NM Water Quality Control Commission. I rely on CCNS and HOPE to provide information and opportunities to take action to challenge the issuance of DP-1132 before the NM Environment Department and the NM Water Quality Control Commission.

Revoking their standing goes against federal precedence for cases of this nature.
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

4/06/23 @ 6:34 AM
Test comment
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

4/04/23 @ 1:51 PM
Test comment
No attachments