AQB 26-57 (P): Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC's Air Quality Permit Application

Comment From: Gary Kowalski

10/20/26 @ 4:03 PM

Like most other Americans, people in New Mexico are not clamoring for more AI data centers, massive projects whose costs are obvious and immediate and whose benefits (aside from enriching the billionaires who own and control the tech companies) are h...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Elaine Cimino

10/15/26 @ 6:03 PM

Re: AQB 26-57(P), Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC — Project Jupiter, Air Quality Permit Application NSR 10883
Request to extend public comment and provide complete revised materials

10/15/26

I request that NMED extend the October 23 public-comme...↓nt deadline and provide at least 30 days for public review after the complete revised application, air-dispersion modeling, proposed permit conditions, and NMED's updated technical analysis are publicly available.

The October 2 agency correspondence identified approximately a 2% increase in emissions but a doubling of modeled pollutant concentrations after more accurate facility-design information was incorporated. NMED questioned whether the original modeling assumptions were defensible and conservative. Its October 9 correspondence requested additional emissions information, stack parameters, supporting calculations, and explanations of configuration changes.
Oracle has since announced a proposed operating cap and a claimed 35% emissions reduction. The public needs the underlying calculations, revised modeling, and enforceable permit language to evaluate that proposal. A corporate announcement cannot substitute for a complete administrative record.

The currently posted October 23 comment deadline also precedes the October 26 hearing planned for New Energy Economy's motion to dismiss. Closing comments before that hearing, while material technical questions remain unresolved, would prevent the public from responding fully to developments affecting this application.
I specifically request that NMED:

Extend or reopen public comment for at least 30 days after all revised materials and the agency's updated analysis are available.
Publish the complete modeling input and output files, emissions calculations, stack and exhaust parameters, and a clear comparison identifying changes from the original application.

Disclose the proposed operating cap, its technical basis, and the monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting, and enforcement provisions that would make it binding.
Identify which pollutants, averaging periods, and receptor locations showed increased concentrations, including results relevant to nearby homes, schools, and playgrounds.
Provide clear public notice of the revised materials and deadline, including accessible English and Spanish notices for affected communities.

Address this extension request in writing before closing public comment.

The public cannot meaningfully evaluate an application while its essential assumptions and operating conditions are changing. NMED must provide a complete, reviewable proposal and sufficient time to examine it. Oracle's construction schedule must not determine how much scrutiny affected communities are allowed.

Please enter this comment and extension request into the administrative record.

Elaine Cimino
Common Ground Rising
Rio Rancho, New Mexico

Attachments:

Download

Comment From: Elaine Thomas

10/15/26 @ 11:50 AM

Project Jupiter and Yucca Growth Infrastructure should be using renewable energy like solar and wind. We have plenty of both. They should not be using fossil fuels. They should never be allowed to impact our already struggling water supply.

No attachments

Comment From: Linda Flatt

10/14/26 @ 1:50 PM

Project Jupiter has a lot of TV ads touting all the wonderful things that our state will receive with this massive project. They say there will be very little emissions and will not use a lot of water with this new technology. There needs to be more ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Claire Romero

10/14/26 @ 6:49 AM

I strongly urge NMED NOT to approve an air quality permit for "AQB 26-57 (P): Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC's Air Quality Permit Application." Many reasons include the proposed methane cells are new technology and have not been used at the level ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: David Hollenbach

10/13/26 @ 4:19 PM

As a PhD scientist, I am concerned most about track record. Yucca Growth Infrastructure proposes using methane fuel cells instead of the methane-fired turbines that were originally planned. The turbines were scrapped because they emit too much NOx...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Denise Flores

10/08/26 @ 4:06 PM

The air quality in the World and New Mexico is a concern for all the conditions they cause to people, cancer, bronchitis, etc not to say what it does to the forests and animals.

No attachments

Comment From: Naomi Locklear

10/06/26 @ 11:56 PM

Please deny the air permits. Our air quality is already very poor and the technology has never been utilized at such a large scale. The results are unknowable. Peoples lives, jobs and the survival of the community including businesses water availa...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Paul Dunn

10/03/26 @ 11:54 AM

I absolutely oppose any more progress on Project Jupiter. The secrecy around the project, the unprecedented levels of pollution and unknown long term consequences of its implementation make it too risky to proceed. I urge you not to approve the propo...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Lura Brookins

10/01/26 @ 9:56 AM

As a resident of New Mexico, I strongly object and disapprove of any permit for Project Jupiter. The dangers to human and environmental health is enormous and should not be allowed.

No attachments

Comment From: Rebecca Molitor

9/30/26 @ 12:22 AM

I strongly oppose the authorization of a permit for Yucca Growth for an air quality permit.

I moved to New Mexico because as a state they prioritize the land, water and air. New Mexicans understand how none of those should be taken for granted. C...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Tina Kerouac

9/29/26 @ 10:39 AM

I strongly object to the air permit for Yucca Growth and any other permits that will allow this data center to operate.

Our natural resources are scarce. This data center will use vast amounts of water, pollute our air and deplete many of our natu...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Megan Griffith

9/27/26 @ 3:10 PM

I am writing to formally voice my strong opposition to the air quality construction permit requested by Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC for the "Project Jupiter" microgrid system. The New Mexico Environment Department must reject this application be...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Bryan Romkey

9/26/26 @ 7:58 PM

No !

No attachments

Comment From: Cameron Zarrabzadeh

9/26/26 @ 7:14 PM

I am writing to formally record my strong opposition to the air quality construction permit application submitted by Yucca Growth Infrastructure, LLC for the "Project Jupiter" microgrid system. The New Mexico Environment Department must deny this per...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Janet Goldstein

9/26/26 @ 2:32 PM

Please REJECT this permit. Yucca has not demonstrated that it will abide by NM environmental regulations. Thank you.

No attachments

Comment From: Catharine Walkinshaw

9/25/26 @ 2:41 PM

I am opposed to the issuance of
this air quality permit to the developers and funders of Project Jupiter. I live, with my family, in the Mesilla Valley. This is an area that already has issues with air quality due to the metropolitan areas of El Paso...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Whitney Lechner

9/25/26 @ 8:51 AM

I do not wish to be an unwilling recipient of the negative pollutant air quality, increased heat island effect, diminished water in my neighborhood, this data center may be going up in NM but it is less than 3 miles from my house in TX. It will cause...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Veronica Villalobos

9/25/26 @ 6:05 AM

Please decline this and any future permits for this agency. I reside in La Union area about 10 miles from this facility. Please protect our environment, our natural resources that are vital for ourselves and future generations. I ask that you plea...↓

No attachments

Comment From: JOYCE KLING

9/20/26 @ 5:56 PM

I do not wish to share New Mexico with Project Jupiter. I want NM to be for humans and animals, not machines using all our power and water. We've lived without them forever and it's clear they're lying about how many jobs they'll be creating. Only th...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Sybil Keyser

9/15/26 @ 5:52 PM

NO to yucca growth infrastructure permit

No attachments

Comment From: Marie Fischer

9/15/26 @ 8:22 AM

I am against Project Jupiter. I fail to see how this center, along with the other proposed or existing centers in NM, will help humanity- (I am referring to New Era Lea, Zenith Volts, Meta, and other centers in nearby Southwestern states).
All of th...↓

No attachments

Comment From: David Buurma

9/14/26 @ 2:30 PM

I am very much against the Project Jupiter data center in Dona Ana County, NM.
The energy generated, the water depleted, and heat generated by the data center might do more harm than good for the people of Dona Ana County. The water depletion is espe...↓

No attachments

Comment From: David Buurma

9/14/26 @ 2:14 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Teri Rose

9/14/26 @ 2:04 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Veronica King

9/11/26 @ 10:40 AM

Building this data center in New Mexico is absolutely ridiculous. The environmental impact to air quality, sound quality and water is a nightmare waiting to happen. This cannot be allowed to move forward without severely limiting the size of the faci...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Susan Reuler, RN, CS

9/10/26 @ 5:35 PM

Deny this application. The negative environmental impact is significant and will strip NM of needed resources especially our precious water. If permitted the health risks are significant. This should not be permitted. YGI's application is incompl...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Cyrus Jordan

9/09/26 @ 11:10 PM

There are better ways to boost New Mexico's economy than sacrificing our environment for short-term gains and long-term suffering. The projected air pollution concentrated around low-income communities, combined with heavy water usage in an escalatin...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Ellie W

9/02/26 @ 9:14 AM

First of all, data centers are doom factories. There is no reason that we the people need to sacrifice our access to clean and abundant water in order to fuel the desires of billionaires to create child porn. Secondly, this is a rape of the land, the...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Barbara Vezzani

8/26/26 @ 1:26 PM

Of course, it's not just the air pollution, but water consumption, overall environmental disruption, and the way AI in general is being rammed down the public's throat without consent. It is my belief that the majority of New Mexicans share a deep lo...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Pueblo of Iseta (Brianna Merrill)

8/24/26 @ 10:15 AM

Please see attached document.

Attachments:

Download

Comment From: Daniel Parraz

8/24/26 @ 8:19 AM

I oppose the allowance of a gas pipeline for gas turbines that are being proposed to power this data center, as New Mexicans have had our air and water polluted by companies that end up filing bankruptcy and never having to fix the problems they crea...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Robert Sharp

8/22/26 @ 9:33 PM

Please deny this application. It is insane to say that this is green when it will still consume so much natural gas. And Project Jupiter will consume way too much water. I do not want for all of New Mexico to suffer because of corporatistic greed and...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Randy Marlatt

8/22/26 @ 10:46 AM

Please deny this permit. Environmental damage from this project cannot be reversed, and New Mexicans will ultimately suffer.

No attachments

Comment From: W Thomas Jones

8/21/26 @ 9:53 PM

Project Jupiter should rely on solar power and batteries rather than fossil fuels. Solar power with batteries is being done at scale in other places, such as California.

No attachments

Comment From: Leah Miller

8/20/26 @ 12:29 PM

We read that Project Jupiter will use as much gas as the city of Albuquerque, but emit greenhouse gases equal to Albuquerque, Santa Fe and Las Cruces combined. This looks like carelessness and haste on the part of the developers. I don't think you sh...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Rafael Lecuona

8/12/26 @ 8:06 PM

What part of NO are the data centers failing to understand? New Mexicans do not want Oracle's Project Jupiter taking our scant resources for their own profit. Also, we do not want AI surveillance and violations of our privacy rights. Oracle has prove...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Patrick Kenedy

8/11/26 @ 9:21 AM

Please deny this permit. This project is not supported by our communities. We must protect our planet and not decimate it further.
No attachments

No attachments

Comment From: Ana Brouwer

8/10/26 @ 11:24 PM

I am strongly against the air permit for Yucca Growth and any other permits that will allow this data center to operate. The last thing we need in our drought-stricken state and community is a data center to recklessly use water, our most precious re...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Jovanna Ronz

8/10/26 @ 3:13 PM

I oppose to another company bringging more air polution to add to the list of other companies that are contaminating like Intel ,what about water and electrical supply ? If companies ccontinue to come to New Mexico this place is heading to become a w...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Chavonne Harroun

8/10/26 @ 8:52 AM

Please deny this permit. This project is not supported by our communities. We must protect our planet and not decimate it further.

No attachments

Comment From: Joshua Wollmann Fuller

8/09/26 @ 12:22 PM

These people are going to reap more resources than we need to enjoy our lives. The possible technology, or data storage capability is not worth giving up my essential resources.

No attachments

Comment From: James Schwar

8/09/26 @ 4:50 AM

I urge the court and state leadership to halt all data center activity until Congress passes strong national safeguards to protect workers, consumers and communities, defend privacy and civil rights and ensure these technologies do not harm our envir...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Caroline Toth

8/08/26 @ 4:29 PM

I am writing to ask you to please halt all further development of the microgrid and all associated structures related to the planned data center as part of Project Jupiter (hereafter PJ). PJ has shown us that they are only interested in listening to ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Melanie Vonfange

8/08/26 @ 12:53 PM

I am a resident of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico, and a researcher involved in public-interest work concerning large-scale data-center development and its effects on New Mexico communities. I am submitting this comment in my individual capacity r...↓

No attachments

Comment From: C Waldrom

8/08/26 @ 9:26 AM

I am asking that no permits of any kind be granted to Project Jupiter. The impact this project will have on water, air, land and animals is devastating and will bring no benefit to the citizens of New Mexico.

No attachments

Comment From: Todd Miller

8/07/26 @ 1:48 PM

The idea of a permit for the infrastructure completion to support part of project Jupiter requires a lot of knowledge and skill. I wrote PSD Major Source Permits for almost 30-yrs, in Texas, Oklahoma, Alabama, projects in Saudi Arabia which actually ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: K Hoffman

8/07/26 @ 11:20 AM

I ask that you approve the air permits as requested by YUCA Growth Infrastructure. As I understand it the air permit requested provides output that is below the maximum level established by the state. If that is so than it should be approved. Poli...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Tammy Gates

8/07/26 @ 10:23 AM

While I support economic development in New Mexico, I object to the fossil-fuel energy infrastructure proposed for Project Jupiter. I object to the over-pumping of our precious water resource - it may be a "renewable" resource, but the amount of rene...↓wal cannot keep up with the amount of use in a drought climate such as this; they are already pumping water 24/7. Furthermore, the impact on the wildlife and humans living in the immediate are a big concern that no one seems to take seriously. The permit should be denied or conditioned upon transitioning to 100% renewable energy and closed-loop water infrastructure.

1. Elimination of Methane-Based Fuel Cells and Regulatory Loopholes
The proposed behind-the-meter microgrid relies on 2.45 GW of Bloom Energy fuel cells powered by natural gas (methane). This setup will emit over 10 million metric tons of CO2 annually. Operating behind the meter is a workaround to bypass the public grid and sidestep compliance with New Mexico's Energy Transition Act, which requires public utilities to transition to 100% zero-carbon electricity by 2045.

2. Compliance with State Climate Mandates
Allowing a private microgrid to emit millions of tons of greenhouse gases directly undermines Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham's Executive Order 2019-003, which mandates a statewide emissions reduction of at least 45% by 2030 and net-zero emissions by 2050. This private, off-grid project must not be exempted from the emission mandates that apply to the rest of New Mexico.

3. Transition to 100% Renewables (Solar and Storage)
Project Jupiter should be powered entirely by renewable energy. NMED must require the project to use solar arrays paired with battery energy storage systems (BESS), replicating the clean energy model successfully deployed at Meta's Los Lunas Data Center, which runs on 100% contracted solar and wind resources.

4. Public Health and Air Quality Harms
The proposed microgrid will emit approximately 150 tons of particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) and 37 tons of nitrogen oxides (NOx) annually in a region that already struggles with ozone and air quality. These emissions threaten the respiratory and cardiovascular health of local New Mexicans, particularly in vulnerable frontline communities.

5. Mandatory Closed-Loop Water Systems
In an arid, water-stressed desert environment, protecting local aquifers is a priority. NMED must mandate the use of strict, fully closed-loop water systems for all cooling infrastructure to prevent groundwater depletion and protect local water resources. NMED should deny Permit No. NSR 10883 unless the applicant commits to 100% renewable energy, integrates with a decarbonizing grid to comply with state law, and utilizes closed-loop water cooling systems.

Thank you for your consideration of these comments.

No attachments

Comment From: Jerry Harrell

8/07/26 @ 9:32 AM

Several people have voiced concerns about this project. They make statements but offer no evidence. Allegations but no proof. They refuse to acknowledge the answers given to their questions. In most cases, they refuse to even speak to people who s...↓

No attachments

Comment From: nathan sanchez

8/07/26 @ 9:12 AM

they stole my identity to make a positive public comment about this permit. straight up robber barons

No attachments

Comment From: Samuel Chasse

8/07/26 @ 8:28 AM

While I support economic development in New Mexico, I object to the fossil-fuel energy infrastructure proposed for Project Jupiter. The permit should be denied or conditioned upon transitioning to 100% renewable energy and closed-loop water infrastru...↓cture.

1. Elimination of Methane-Based Fuel Cells and Regulatory Loopholes
The proposed behind-the-meter microgrid relies on 2.45 GW of Bloom Energy fuel cells powered by natural gas (methane). This setup will emit over 10 million metric tons of CO2 annually. Operating behind the meter is a workaround to bypass the public grid and sidestep compliance with New Mexico's Energy Transition Act, which requires public utilities to transition to 100% zero-carbon electricity by 2045.

2. Compliance with State Climate Mandates
Allowing a private microgrid to emit millions of tons of greenhouse gases directly undermines Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham's Executive Order 2019-003, which mandates a statewide emissions reduction of at least 45% by 2030 and net-zero emissions by 2050. This private, off-grid project must not be exempted from the emission mandates that apply to the rest of New Mexico.

3. Transition to 100% Renewables (Solar and Storage)
Project Jupiter should be powered entirely by renewable energy. NMED must require the project to use solar arrays paired with battery energy storage systems (BESS), replicating the clean energy model successfully deployed at Meta's Los Lunas Data Center, which runs on 100% contracted solar and wind resources.

4. Public Health and Air Quality Harms
The proposed microgrid will emit approximately 150 tons of particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) and 37 tons of nitrogen oxides (NOx) annually in a region that already struggles with ozone and air quality. These emissions threaten the respiratory and cardiovascular health of local New Mexicans, particularly in vulnerable frontline communities.

5. Mandatory Closed-Loop Water Systems
In an arid, water-stressed desert environment, protecting local aquifers is a priority. NMED must mandate the use of strict, fully closed-loop water systems for all cooling infrastructure to prevent groundwater depletion and protect local water resources.

NMED should deny Permit No. NSR 10883 unless the applicant commits to 100% renewable energy, integrates with a decarbonizing grid to comply with state law, and utilizes closed-loop water cooling systems.

Thank you for your consideration of these comments.

No attachments

Comment From: David Marble

8/07/26 @ 8:19 AM

New Mexicans do not need, or want a data center. The noise, water pollution and heat pollution are nothing we want in our desert community. It lowers the property values and makes the community unlivable. And we all know that these data centers are h...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Isabel Dalton

8/07/26 @ 7:28 AM

I am vehemently against the development of Project Jupiter in any capacity. Project Jupiter has already damaged the lives of New Mexicans and eroded trust in the government because there have been reports of falsified comments in support of the proje...↓

No attachments

Comment From: pat felhauer

8/07/26 @ 7:20 AM

Project jupiter should never have been allowed. The air quality will go down affecting older people and people with lung problems. Please do not pass!

No attachments

Comment From: Candela Fernández

8/07/26 @ 3:58 AM

The 'Jupiter Project' endangers both the human and the wildlife's communities of New Mexico, and threatens to contribute to change our climate and further worsen our quality of life. Furthermore, it runs counter to the interests of the majority of Ne...↓

No attachments

Comment From: April Rubio

8/06/26 @ 9:44 PM

Project Jupiter represents an overreach that bypasses our established community zoning laws. This development benefits outside investors at the expense of current residents, offering zero long-term value to our neighborhood. We demand transparency fr...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Diane Laughlin

8/06/26 @ 7:45 PM

I am against every aspect of this data center. The pollution it will create is off the charts unacceptable, not to mention the water needed. Our water supply is at critically low levels. They say it will create jobs, but in the long run it will tak...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Chris Armijo

8/06/26 @ 7:44 PM

Please deny this do not approve. Keep New Mexico, New Mexico.

No attachments

Comment From: Rachel Armijo

8/06/26 @ 7:32 PM

Please deny this permit. This project is not supported by the community. We value our beautiful, ancient desert. We must protect our planet and not decimate it further. Keep New Mexico beautiful and natural!

No attachments

Comment From: James Fritzler

8/06/26 @ 7:12 PM

The Jupiter Project is a scam. Their use of politicians names in support without these people's knowledge, their constant presence in public with reps around every public corner is desperate; the physical abuse at the Santa Ana public hearing was app...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Brenda Solis

8/06/26 @ 6:33 PM

I am trying to access the order regarding the hearing filed 8 5 26 and it will not open.

The public has a right to be at these hearings. Yucca should be made to understand that they do not control the situation. The Board is responsible to the Peopl...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Coda Weaver

8/06/26 @ 6:00 PM

I do NOT support this project or any facet of it. Firstly, Project Jupiter has been paying for campaigners in the local area to help promote the project, but the workers provide information of those who also disagree with this initiative and claim th...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Vanessa Kenner

8/06/26 @ 6:00 PM

This entire process appears to have lacked honest transparency and integrity from the jump. Project Jupiter has been forced on the public by deception and greed backing the entire project. No one I know wants this atrocity in our community, nor do we...↓

Attachments:

Download

Comment From: Drew Goretzka

8/06/26 @ 3:22 PM

This is a test comment.

No attachments

Comment From: Kimberly Martin

8/05/26 @ 11:36 AM

This project should not be allowed in New Mexico for a myriad of reasons. While I realize that NMED will just be ruling on whether the greenhouse gas emissions from this project should be allowed, I must first comment on the slicks advertisements of...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/03/26 @ 1:55 PM

We need to save our planet. Not destroy it.

No attachments

Comment From: Johnnie Frazzini

7/30/26 @ 9:59 AM

Subject: Public Comment on Permit Application 10883 — YGI Microgrid (Project Jupiter)

To the New Mexico Environment Department,

As a resident of Doña Ana County, I am writing to express my severe concerns regarding the environmental, economic, and ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Silvia Marines

7/28/26 @ 11:28 PM

I do not support this project. It has been pushed through without proper community input. All of the labor is from outside of the state and the future jobs are likely to also be from outside of the state. Our energy bills are increasing because of th...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Tina Nelson

7/28/26 @ 11:23 PM

I oppose project Jupiter poisoning our community resources. Las Cruces does not need or want a data center. I don't believe or agree with the arrest and suppression of community leader voices at the BOCC. This will raise energy prices for our communi...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Nicholas Maxwell

7/27/26 @ 9:24 AM

See attached.

Attachments:

Download

Comment From: Walker Laughlin

7/26/26 @ 10:36 AM

I urge NMED to DENY Yucca Growth Infrastructure's Air Quality Permit Application. If approved, the project would emit more annual CO2 emissions than Albuquerque and Las Cruces combined. Furthermore, it would release harmful pollutants, such as NO2, t...↓

Attachments:

Download

Comment From: Sarah Weschler

7/24/26 @ 8:43 AM

There is nothing a massive data center in the middle of an already resource depleted area can do for the people long term. I don't know who's getting rich off this, but it's not regular New Mexicans that are already dealing with poor air quality. N...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Taylor Conlin

7/23/26 @ 12:12 PM

I am writing against the proposed air quality permit request.

As a resident of New Mexico, I don't believe New Mexico should host Data Centers. It is a strain on already tight resources, water and energy. Yucca, Oracle, Open AI and Project Jupiter h...↓ave shown they do NOT have New Mexican's best interests in mind. And they will continue to manipulate and pay to exploit our land and resources to line their pockets. The promises made are not enough to justify the harm that will be caused. They have also not worked in good faith. Paying people to harass and lie to residents and submit fraudulent comments.

I don't trust Project Jupiter and I think most residents also feel the same.

Data Centers need more regulation. They need to be held accountable, they need to pay for the energy and resources. That cost should not be passed on to residents since we do not see any benefit. New Mexicans are being exploited to continue to line the pockets of billionaires and oligarchs. All while the planet gets hotter and the Rio Grande runs dry.

Project Jupiter will emit more Greenhouse gas than Albuquerque, Las Cruces, and Santa Fe combined. They have failed to meet deadlines to submit proper jobs reports. If the reports were favorable I don't think they would have missed those deadlines. I believe they missed them because they failed to meet the proposed jobs they alleged they would provide to New Mexican's.

Along with everything above, data centers cause obscene noise pollution that would negatively affect people and wildlife. Would leech harmful forever chemicals into the soil and water systems It would raise day time and night time temperatures in the area. They would emit CO2 and Nitrogen Oxide increasing risk of asthma, cancer, and heart attacks to anyone in the area.

It would bring higher energy costs to local residents already facing possible increases should PNM be acquired by Blackstone (Open AI and Blackstone have a 10 billion dollar deal that should be considered a conflict of interest!). At a minimum Project Jupiter should pay for the entire cost energy and infrastructure required to support it.

TLDR Data Centers are a bad deal for New Mexicans and all data center construction should be halted and reevaluated to benefit the community and the land that they occupy, not the shareholders and companies only seeking to profit on the exploitation of the people of New Mexico

No attachments

Comment From: Fox Richards

7/23/26 @ 12:03 PM

I am in strong opposition of Project Jupiter and any other data centers that may be proposed in the future. These structures require a large quantity of natural resources that are already finite in New Mexico. We cannot ignore the permanent harm this...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Geneva Poteet

7/22/26 @ 11:01 AM

I am writing to formally log my opposition to Project Jupiter, the massive data center campus under development in Doña Ana County. I urge state regulatory bodies, including the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED), to deny the project's pending ...↓air quality permit due to catastrophic environmental risks and documented corporate deception:

Air Pollution and Carbon Emissions: The developer's plan to power this facility via an off-grid microgrid consisting of over 2,200 solid oxide fuel cells relies on an extensive natural gas system. This setup is estimated to produce more than 10 million tons of greenhouse gases per year. This massive influx of carbon dioxide equivalent directly undermines New Mexico's climate goals and threatens local air quality.

Water Depletion and Toxic Sludge: Beyond consuming massive quantities of local water, Project Jupiter relies on a proposed desalination plant to support its operations. The desalination process generates a highly concentrated, toxic sludge byproduct. Disposing of this hazardous waste threatens to poison local soil and delicate desert aquifers, exacerbating regional water scarcity.

Bloom Energy's Hazardous Waste Track Record: The decision to utilize Bloom Energy LLC fuel cells brings severe chemical hazards to New Mexico. Bloom Energy has faced heavy federal scrutiny, including an EPA hazardous waste probe and lawsuits alleging the company illegal dumped benzene, chromium, and lead into a public California landfill. Introducing a company known for generating and allegedly dumping these dangerous carcinogens and heavy metals poses an unacceptable public health risk to Doña Ana County.

Subversion of the Democratic Process: The New Mexico Department of Justice is currently conducting a formal investigation into widespread public comment fraud. Hundreds of supportive comments—including those under the names of local residents and state representatives—were fraudulently submitted without consent by pro-project canvassers.

Astroturfing and Dark Money Corporate Ties: The New Mexico State Ethics Commission has sued the unregistered entity "Elevate New Mexico" for running a deceptive, multi-thousand-dollar lobbying campaign to push this project. Public records have traced this "homegrown" front group directly back to APCO Worldwide, a powerful global public relations and lobbying firm. New Mexico communities refuse to be manipulated by out-of-state dark money and corporate astroturfing. New Mexico's finite natural resources must be preserved for its residents, not sacrificed for a corporate data center. I ask that NMED and state leadership halt further permitting for Project Jupiter.

No attachments

Comment From: Sara Padilla

7/21/26 @ 6:41 PM

AI data centers use too much water and energy and create too much pollution. I believe that they should not be built anywhere, but most especially in a desert, especially in a time of drought.

No attachments

Comment From: abraham brown

7/20/26 @ 3:20 PM

I stand firmly against any AI data centers in the State of New Mexico. The benefits of AI data centers are far outweighed by the cost of our water resources for operating them. Don't trade water for data.

No attachments

Comment From: Greta Anonymous

7/17/26 @ 6:01 PM

Hea

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/17/26 @ 5:56 PM

The public should be given an additional 60 days to review and comment on the air quality permit so community members can participate equitably.
The air quality permit application should be denied given Bloom Energy's history of illegal dumping hazar...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Madeline Anonymous

7/17/26 @ 5:55 PM

Stop food waste!!!

No attachments

Comment From: Saltanat Aiyp

7/17/26 @ 5:54 PM

There is no planet B!

No attachments

Comment From: N/A N/A

7/17/26 @ 5:52 PM

This is more greenhouse gas pollution than New Mexico's three largest cities combined Albuquerque, Las Cruces, and Santa Fe.

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/17/26 @ 5:51 PM

I hate seeing how these projects destroy my beautiful planet just for some money that after everything they're doing will value nothing. I don't live near this is happening, but i don't need to live near to see the hell this project is causing and wi...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Camilia Mestoui

7/17/26 @ 5:48 PM

The proposed design has an individual exhaust stack on each fuel cell, of which there will be 2,275. It would be inefficient to place monitors and controls on each individual stack and there are NO proposed pollution controls on any of these stacks. ...↓How, then, will this project show evidence of their compliance with emissions limit requirements under Title V? Has there been or will there ever be upstream fuel testing of methane gas to anticipate the composition of these fuel cells' emissions? How exactly will NMED enforce emissions standards without direct, long-term, continuous monitoring? Or isolate their deleterious impact on air quality without an accurate assessment of localized pollution? A fuel cell can continue to generate electricity or maintain operating temperatures while experiencing catalyst degradation which causes a massive spike in the release of carbon monoxide or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This project would need to centralize the 2,275 individual stack emissions into an exponentially smaller number of exhaust systems so that Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) installed on these central exhaust systems can provide real-time, accurate data about operational compliance. As it is, this design plan completely fails to provide monitoring conditions that are "practically enforceable" under 20.2.70.302.B NMAC. A proposal, such as this one, that relies on computer simulation modeling instead of actual, measured air pollution at scale is invalid, untrustworthy, and far from what residents of Doña Ana County and New Mexico deserve. What data was used to train these models? When and where was this data collected? What proportion of those involved in the development of this model have, at any time, received money from the corporations involved? How much? If NMED allows group testing for this project, 99% of the exhaust stacks at this facility will never be physically tested during the entire life of the Title V permit. This creates an unmonitored loophole that violates the Clean Air Act's mandate for continuous compliance.
We know the pollution approximations provided are based on an extremely lazy testing methodology and while we were not told whether these 4 tests were even done on-site or during peak temperatures, we can safely assume the applicants cut corners here as well in an attempt to fast track this approval. As I write this, Project Jupiter is draining an undisclosed amount of water from our shared aquifer on a daily basis. Given the st atistical invalidity of their pollution estimates, approving this air permit under any circumstance would be to allow this project to introduce unmitigated and undisclosed hazards into our air without consequence.
Children attending Santa Teresa Elementary School will sit innocently, every day, LESS THAN ONE MILE from this pollution. Three other schools, an elder care center, and three public parks sit within around 4 miles of this project. Deny this air permit. Gambling with the fragile health of our children and elders would be a complete defilement of the authority vested in you.

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/17/26 @ 5:46 PM

WE DONT NEED AI TO LIVE. STOP THE CONSTRUCTION OF DATA CENTERS

No attachments

Comment From: Davianca Guerrero

7/17/26 @ 5:45 PM

I care about the environment, and the future earth my future kids will have to live on ! I urge you to make a change!!!

No attachments

Comment From: asser khidr

7/17/26 @ 5:44 PM

I am a resident of cairo and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and sec...↓ure future. That future is under threat with this proposed air quality permit. A change to fuel cells has minimal impacts on the suffering we will endure as a result of the gas plant's air pollution. To add 10 million tons of carbon dioxide pollution and a vague estimate of toxic emissions to our active and long-time nonattainment zone would be nothing short of blatant environmental racism. Our metro area is currently 16th worst in the nation for ozone pollution and we have received a failing grade on this air quality standard every single year since 2000. We are already breathing some of the most compromised air in the country. It is unacceptable to invite a new source of hyperscale air pollution into our communities.
The carbon dioxide pollution alone will heat our atmosphere at a much faster pace and promote the formation of even more ground-level ozone. Last summer, my 7 year old suffered a grand mal seizure while on the playground at school because the extreme heat led to electrolyte imbalances. My brother works outside everyday without shade or rest breaks and has nowhere to keep his insulin cool. I can barely pay my electricity bills in the summer as it is. We cannot afford more intense heat. The other toxic air pollutants are extremely dangerous–many of them at very low levels. How am I supposed to send my kids to school knowing what they are breathing in? Knowing it can cause permanent brain damage or breathing complications before they have had a chance to grow up.
Fuel cells also create hazardous waste and the fuel cell provider for this project has a history of illegally dumping this waste and hiding it for several years. This company will likely repeat its bad habits, illegally dumping dangerous and undisclosed chemicals into our public landfills, and we will just have to wait until somebody notices? Our county has and continues to face an illegal dumping epidemic so how can I be sure that these systemic oversight failures we have locally won't continue and expand to include this dangerous and experimental fuel cell operation. A fine for illegal dumping does not undo damage or its spread once our aquifer and soils are contaminated. It also will not re-capture the volatile chemicals that are released into the air when hazardous waste is improperly stored and disposed of.
My family's health and safety should be worth more than the profits of out-of-state corporations. The only defensible options moving forward are to deny this air permit or you must hold a public hearing in-person in Santa Teresa with a component for virtual participation. Materials and the hearing itself must be translated into Spanish and meet any other accessibility needs requested by community members.

No attachments

Comment From: Anna Harvey

7/17/26 @ 5:42 PM

I am a resident of Ohio and I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and secu...↓re future. That future is under threat with this proposed air quality permit. A change to fuel cells has minimal impacts on the suffering we will endure as a result of the gas plant's air pollution. To add 10 million tons of carbon dioxide pollution and a vague estimate of toxic emissions to our active and long-time nonattainment zone would be nothing short of blatant environmental racism. Our metro area is currently 16th worst in the nation for ozone pollution and we have received a failing grade on this air quality standard every single year since 2000. We are already breathing some of the most compromised air in the country. It is unacceptable to invite a new source of hyperscale air pollution into our communities.
The carbon dioxide pollution alone will heat our atmosphere at a much faster pace and promote the formation of even more ground-level ozone. Last summer, my 7 year old suffered a grand mal seizure while on the playground at school because the extreme heat led to electrolyte imbalances. My brother works outside everyday without shade or rest breaks and has nowhere to keep his insulin cool. I can barely pay my electricity bills in the summer as it is. We cannot afford more intense heat. The other toxic air pollutants are extremely dangerous–many of them at very low levels. How am I supposed to send my kids to school knowing what they are breathing in? Knowing it can cause permanent brain damage or breathing complications before they have had a chance to grow up.
Fuel cells also create hazardous waste and the fuel cell provider for this project has a history of illegally dumping this waste and hiding it for several years. This company will likely repeat its bad habits, illegally dumping dangerous and undisclosed chemicals into our public landfills, and we will just have to wait until somebody notices? Our county has and continues to face an illegal dumping epidemic so how can I be sure that these systemic oversight failures we have locally won't continue and expand to include this dangerous and experimental fuel cell operation. A fine for illegal dumping does not undo damage or its spread once our aquifer and soils are contaminated. It also will not re-capture the volatile chemicals that are released into the air when hazardous waste is improperly stored and disposed of.
My family's health and safety should be worth more than the profits of out-of-state corporations. The only defensible options moving forward are to deny this air permit or you must hold a public hearing in-person in Santa Teresa with a component for virtual participation. Materials and the hearing itself must be translated into Spanish and meet any other accessibility needs requested by community members.

No attachments

Comment From: anonymous anonymous

7/17/26 @ 5:41 PM

Please stop, I am a young generation myself and instead of worrying about dying of old age, I am worrying about dying cause of climate change. This world is slowly dying and capitalism is making it worse. I am scared and beyond terrified about my fut...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Ayesha Anonymous

7/17/26 @ 5:39 PM

Out of all planets, universes and galaxies, Our planet is the only livable one. We're the only planet with safe waters and trees. And those data centers are warming our planet, and affecting our planet and it's ecosystems! I want a ban on Ai data cen...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Raya Cabriga

7/17/26 @ 5:38 PM

I care very deeply for the present and future of generations. After all, I am part of a generation in which we are the first to experience the negative effects of the air quality declining and the last generation to do something about it. I greatly o...↓

No attachments

Comment From: natalie hartz

7/17/26 @ 5:37 PM

We have no planet B. for so so so many years we have survived without generative AI, thriving off what the earth has to bring us, the NECESSITIES that we CANNOT survive without. Not only by building these data centers are we releasing unbelievable am...↓

No attachments

Comment From: tamera harper

7/17/26 @ 5:35 PM

I don't think Project Jupiter should happen. We're already dealing with climate change and considering AI and ChatGPT uses hundreds and hundreds of water while the Rio Grande is drying up it's just going to make it worse. We need more birds, animals ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Cade Rodriguez

7/17/26 @ 5:33 PM

Didn't realize it was this bad, I had talked to one of the people that were advertising it on the streets before I knew what it was abt and I didn't realize it was an ai center

No attachments

Comment From: Asiya Akbar

7/17/26 @ 5:33 PM

NO ONE WANTS PROJECT JUPITER, WE DONT HAVE ANY WATER AND YOU GUYS WANT MILLIONS OF GALLONS OF WATER? ABSOLUTELY NOT STOP ALL PLANNING AND COMPLETELY SHUT DOWN THE PROJECT BECAUSE NO ONE WANTS IT, THE AIR IS BAD AS IT IS AND WE DONT NEED TO MAKE IT WO...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Stephany Garcia Marquez

7/17/26 @ 5:31 PM

Please, reconsider. For our youth and the future youth.

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

7/17/26 @ 5:30 PM

I am asking that you deny Yucca Growth Infrastructure's air quality permit. I live here with many generations of my family and this is our home. I want to continue raising my children here knowing they have a safe and secure future. That future is un...↓der threat with this proposed air quality permit. A change to fuel cells has minimal impacts on the suffering we will endure as a result of the gas plant's air pollution. To add 10 million tons of carbon dioxide pollution and a vague estimate of toxic emissions to our active and long-time nonattainment zone would be nothing short of blatant environmental racism. Our metro area is currently 16th worst in the nation for ozone pollution and we have received a failing grade on this air quality standard every single year since 2000. We are already breathing some of the most compromised air in the country. It is unacceptable to invite a new source of hyperscale air pollution into our communities.
The carbon dioxide pollution alone will heat our atmosphere at a much faster pace and promote the formation of even more ground-level ozone. Last summer, my 7 year old suffered a grand mal seizure while on the playground at school because the extreme heat led to electrolyte imbalances. My brother works outside everyday without shade or rest breaks and has nowhere to keep his insulin cool. I can barely pay my electricity bills in the summer as it is. We cannot afford more intense heat. The other toxic air pollutants are extremely dangerous–many of them at very low levels. How am I supposed to send my kids to school knowing what they are breathing in? Knowing it can cause permanent brain damage or breathing complications before they have had a chance to grow up.
Fuel cells also create hazardous waste and the fuel cell provider for this project has a history of illegally dumping this waste and hiding it for several years. This company will likely repeat its bad habits, illegally dumping dangerous and undisclosed chemicals into our public landfills, and we will just have to wait until somebody notices? Our county has and continues to face an illegal dumping epidemic so how can I be sure that these systemic oversight failures we have locally won't continue and expand to include this dangerous and experimental fuel cell operation. A fine for illegal dumping does not undo damage or its spread once our aquifer and soils are contaminated. It also will not re-capture the volatile chemicals that are released into the air when hazardous waste is improperly stored and disposed of.
My family's health and safety should be worth more than the profits of out-of-state corporations. The only defensible options moving forward are to deny this air permit or you must hold a public hearing in-person in Santa Teresa with a component for virtual participation. Materials and the hearing itself must be translated into Spanish and meet any other accessibility needs requested by community members.

No attachments

Comment From: Julian Baros

7/17/26 @ 5:26 PM

The water in New Mexico is not just water it is a way of life in New Mexico. New Mexico's water is a life line for the state and Project Jupiter is going to pollute and destroy it. Project Jupiter is the worst thing for New Mexico we need less data c...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Jessica Rodriguez

7/17/26 @ 5:24 PM

Out state is a desert and in recent years we've been in a drought. Not only that we've been growing in popularity gaining more residents. Our rivers are dry and this year 2026 we've had at least 3 fires in my area . It dry and they can't be contained...↓

No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]